GE 2008: Obama's place in the national rankings
-over a number of time periods and under specific conditions-
With Obama's winning percent (52.88%) and winning margin (+7.27) now finalized, here is an analysis of how he ranks in electoral history.
Of course, it is a matter of how you want to analyze all of this, so I am providing ten (10) different methods for ranking, and then at the end, 2 tables comparing all 20 ranking values as percentiles of the number of elections in the comparisons.
Table 1: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections where the popular vote was counted (1824-2008). This is the largest and most comprehensive table, but probably not the fairest to GOP candidates.
Table 2: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections since the GOP first competed in presidential elections (1856-2008). This is probably the more fair comparison, when you compare Obama to the performance of both major parties.
Table 3: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections over 100 years (1908-2008).
Table 4: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections over 60 years (1948-2008, the „Nuclear Age“)
Table 5: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections where the democrats won and the popular vote was counted (1824-2008).
Table 6: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections where the democrats won between 1856-2008.
Table 7: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections where the democrats won over 100 years (1908-2008).
Table 8: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections where the democrats won over 60 years (1948-2008).
Table 9: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections that were open or semi-open elections since 1856.
Table 10: a ranking of % and margin, comparing Obama's performance in 2008 to all US elections that were only completely open elections since 1856. This comparison in interesting since Obama has been the first newly elected President in a completely open election (see below) since 1952, 56 years ago.
There is disagreement about what constitutes „open“. Some claim that „open“ means an election where neither the sitting President nor the sitting Vice-President are on the ballot. But how do you classify elections where an incumbent (whose accession to the presidency was through the death or resignment of the duly elected president) is on the ballot, but not running for re-election? In 1964, Johnson was still filling out Kennedy's first term and ran in 1964 for his first term. This means that in 1964, Johnson was not up for re-election, but he did have the power and the influence of the incumbency to help in his election bid.. So, for the sake of fairness, I reclassify this genre into „open“ and „semi-open“.
Open: no incumbent President seeking a second term, no incumbent Vice-President seeking a promotion and a pay raise. This means that both names on the incumbent ballot for president are names of people not currently in the no.1 and no.2 slot in the nation. Examples of open elections: 2008, 1952, 1928, 1920
Semi-Open: No incumbent President seeking a second term, but an incumbent President filling out another incumbent's term now seeking a term in his own right, or an incumbent Vice-President seeking a first term as President. Examples of semi-open elections: 2000, 1988, 1976, 1968, 1960, 1948.
TABLE 1: ALL General Elections since inclusion of the popular vote (1824-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 26.17% | 1920 | Harding |
2 | 60.80% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD | 2 | 25.22% | 1924 | Coolidge |
3 | 60.67% | 1972 | Nixon | 3 | 24.25% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD |
4 | 60.32% | 1920 | Harding | 4 | 23.15% | 1972 | Nixon |
5 | 58.77% | 1984 | Reagan | 5 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
6 | 58.21% | 1928 | Hoover | 6 | 18.83% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T |
7 | 57.41% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD | 7 | 18.22% | 1984 | Reagan |
8 | 57.37% | 1956 | Eisenhower | 8 | 17.81% | 1832 | Jackson |
9 | 56.42% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T | 9 | 17.72% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD |
10 | 55.93% | 1828 | Jackson | 10 | 17.42% | 1928 | Hoover |
11 | 55.58% | 1872 | Grant | 11 | 15.40% | 1956 | Eisenhower |
12 | 55.18% | 1952 | Eisenhower | 12 | 14.44% | 1912 | Wilson |
13 | 55.03% | 1864 | Lincoln | 13 | 14.20% | 1836 | Van Buren |
14-a | 54.74% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD | 14 | 12.26% | 1828 | Jackson |
14-b | 54.74% | 1832 | Jackson | 15 | 12.20% | 1856 | Buchanan |
15 | 54.02% | 1924 | Coolidge | 16 | 11.80% | 1872 | Grant |
16 | 53.39% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD | 17 | 10.85% | 1952 | Eisenhower |
17 | 53.37% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. | 18 | 10.44% | 1824 | Jackson |
18 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama** | 19 | 10.13% | 1860 | Lincoln |
19 | 52.87% | 1840 | Harrison** | 20 | 10.08% | 1864 | Lincoln |
20 | 52.66% | 1868 | Grant | 21 | 9.95% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD |
21 | 51.64% | 1900 | McKinley | 22 | 9.74% | 1980 | Reagan |
22 | 51.57% | 1908 | Taft | 23 | 8.53% | 1908 | Taft |
23 | 51.02% | 1896 | McKinley | 24 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
24 | 50.92% | 1876 | Tilden* | 25 | 7.73% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. |
25 | 50.83% | 1852 | Pierce | 26 | 7.49% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD |
26 | 50.79% | 1836 | Van Buren | 27 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
27 | 50.75% | 1980 | Reagan | 28 | 6.95% | 1852 | Pierce |
28 | 50.73% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. | 29 | 6.13% | 1900 | McKinley |
29 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 30 | 6.05% | 1840 | Harrison |
30 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 31 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
31 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 32 | 5.33% | 1868 | Grant |
32 | 49.54% | 1844 | Polk | 33 | 4.79% | 1848 | Taylor |
33 | 49.24% | 1916 | Wilson | 34 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
34 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 35 | 4.31% | 1896 | McKinley |
35 | 48.85% | 1884 | Cleveland | 36 | 3.12% | 1916 | Wilson |
36 | 48.63% | 1888 | Cleveland* | 37 | 3.01% | 1892 | Cleveland |
37 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 38 | 3.00% | 1876 | Tilden* |
38 | 48.31% | 1880 | Garfield | 39 | 2.46% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. |
39 | 47.28% | 1848 | Taylor | 40 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
40 | 46.02% | 1892 | Cleveland | 41 | 1.46% | 1844 | Polk |
41 | 45.29% | 1856 | Buchanan | 42 | 0.83% | 1888 | Cleveland* |
42 | 43.42% | 1968 | Nixon | 43 | 0.70% | 1968 | Nixon |
43 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 44 | 0.57% | 1884 | Cleveland |
44 | 41.84% | 1912 | Wilson | 45 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
45 | 41.36% | 1824 | Jackson* | 46 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
46 | 39.65% | 1860 | Lincoln | 47 | 0.10% | 1880 | Garfield |
*Indicates an electoral backfire: the winner of the PV did not win the GE.
**Since Obama and Harrison are tied for the national popular vote percentage, I have assigned Obama the higher position in the rankings, since his winning margin was higher than Harrison's.
TABLE 2: All General Elections since the inclusion of the GOP (1856-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 26.17% | 1920 | Harding |
2 | 60.80% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD | 2 | 25.22% | 1924 | Coolidge |
3 | 60.67% | 1972 | Nixon | 3 | 24.25% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD |
4 | 60.32% | 1920 | Harding | 4 | 23.15% | 1972 | Nixon |
5 | 58.77% | 1984 | Reagan | 5 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
6 | 58.21% | 1928 | Hoover | 6 | 18.83% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T |
7 | 57.41% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD | 7 | 18.22% | 1984 | Reagan |
8 | 57.37% | 1956 | Eisenhower | 8 | 17.72% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD |
9 | 56.42% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T | 9 | 17.42% | 1928 | Hoover |
10 | 55.58% | 1872 | Grant | 10 | 15.40% | 1956 | Eisenhower |
11 | 55.18% | 1952 | Eisenhower | 11 | 14.44% | 1912 | Wilson |
12 | 55.03% | 1864 | Lincoln | 12 | 12.20% | 1856 | Buchanan |
13 | 54.74% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD | 13 | 11.80% | 1872 | Grant |
14 | 54.02% | 1924 | Coolidge | 14 | 10.85% | 1952 | Eisenhower |
15 | 53.39% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD | 15 | 10.13% | 1860 | Lincoln |
16 | 53.37% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. | 16 | 10.08% | 1864 | Lincoln |
17 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 17 | 9.95% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD |
18 | 52.66% | 1868 | Grant | 18 | 9.74% | 1980 | Reagan |
19 | 51.64% | 1900 | McKinley | 19 | 8.53% | 1908 | Taft |
20 | 51.57% | 1908 | Taft | 20 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
21 | 51.02% | 1896 | McKinley | 21 | 7.73% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. |
22 | 50.92% | 1876 | Tilden* | 22 | 7.49% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD |
23 | 50.75% | 1980 | Reagan | 23 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
24 | 50.73% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. | 24 | 6.13% | 1900 | McKinley |
25 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 25 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
26 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 26 | 5.33% | 1868 | Grant |
27 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 27 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
28 | 49.24% | 1916 | Wilson | 28 | 4.31% | 1896 | McKinley |
29 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 29 | 3.12% | 1916 | Wilson |
30 | 48.85% | 1884 | Cleveland | 30 | 3.01% | 1892 | Cleveland |
31 | 48.63% | 1888 | Cleveland* | 31 | 3.00% | 1876 | Tilden* |
32 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 32 | 2.46% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. |
33 | 48.31% | 1880 | Garfield | 33 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
34 | 46.02% | 1892 | Cleveland | 34 | 0.83% | 1888 | Cleveland* |
35 | 45.29% | 1856 | Buchanan | 35 | 0.70% | 1968 | Nixon |
36 | 43.42% | 1968 | Nixon | 36 | 0.57% | 1884 | Cleveland |
37 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 37 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
38 | 41.84% | 1912 | Wilson | 38 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
39 | 39.65% | 1860 | Lincoln | 39 | 0.10% | 1880 | Garfield |
Table 3: all General Elections over 100 years (1908-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 26.17% | 1920 | Harding |
2 | 60.80% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD | 2 | 25.22% | 1924 | Coolidge |
3 | 60.67% | 1972 | Nixon | 3 | 24.25% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD |
4 | 60.32% | 1920 | Harding | 4 | 23.15% | 1972 | Nixon |
5 | 58.77% | 1984 | Reagan | 5 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
6 | 58.21% | 1928 | Hoover | 6 | 18.22% | 1984 | Reagan |
7 | 57.41% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD | 7 | 17.72% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD |
8 | 57.37% | 1956 | Eisenhower | 8 | 17.42% | 1928 | Hoover |
9 | 55.18% | 1952 | Eisenhower | 9 | 15.40% | 1956 | Eisenhower |
10 | 54.74% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD | 10 | 14.44% | 1912 | Wilson |
11 | 54.02% | 1924 | Coolidge | 11 | 10.85% | 1952 | Eisenhower |
12 | 53.39% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD | 12 | 9.95% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD |
13 | 53.37% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. | 13 | 9.74% | 1980 | Reagan |
14 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 14 | 8.53% | 1908 | Taft |
15 | 51.57% | 1908 | Taft | 15 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
16 | 50.75% | 1980 | Reagan | 16 | 7.73% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. |
17 | 50.73% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. | 17 | 7.49% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD |
18 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 18 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
19 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 19 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
20 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 20 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
21 | 49.24% | 1916 | Wilson | 21 | 3.12% | 1916 | Wilson |
22 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 22 | 2.46% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. |
23 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 23 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
24 | 43.42% | 1968 | Nixon | 24 | 0.70% | 1968 | Nixon |
25 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 25 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
26 | 41.84% | 1912 | Wilson | 26 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
Table 4: all General Elections over 60 years (1948-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 23.15% | 1972 | Nixon |
2 | 60.67% | 1972 | Nixon | 2 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
3 | 58.77% | 1984 | Reagan | 3 | 18.22% | 1984 | Reagan |
4 | 57.37% | 1956 | Eisenhower | 4 | 15.40% | 1956 | Eisenhower |
5 | 55.18% | 1952 | Eisenhower | 5 | 10.85% | 1952 | Eisenhower |
6 | 53.37% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. | 6 | 9.74% | 1980 | Reagan |
7 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 7 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
8 | 50.75% | 1980 | Reagan | 8 | 7.73% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. |
9 | 50.73% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. | 9 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
10 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 10 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
11 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 11 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
12 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 12 | 2.46% | 2004 | Bush, G. Jr. |
13 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 13 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
14 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 14 | 0.70% | 1968 | Nixon |
15 | 43.42% | 1968 | Nixon | 15 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
16 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 16 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
Table 5: All General Elections where the DEMOCRAT won in the popular vote since the inclusion of the popular vote in statistics (1824-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 24.25% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD |
2 | 60.80% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD | 2 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
3 | 57.41% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD | 3 | 17.81% | 1832 | Jackson |
4 | 55.93% | 1828 | Jackson | 4 | 17.72% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD |
5 | 54.74% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD | 5 | 14.44% | 1912 | Wilson |
6 | 54.74% | 1832 | Jackson | 6 | 14.20% | 1836 | Van Buren |
7 | 53.39% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD | 7 | 12.26% | 1828 | Jackson |
8 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 8 | 12.20% | 1856 | Buchanan |
9 | 50.92% | 1876 | Tilden* | 9 | 10.44% | 1824 | Jackson |
10 | 50.83% | 1852 | Pierce | 10 | 9.95% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD |
11 | 50.79% | 1836 | Van Buren | 11 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
12 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 12 | 7.49% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD |
13 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 13 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
14 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 14 | 6.95% | 1852 | Pierce |
15 | 49.54% | 1844 | Polk | 15 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
16 | 49.24% | 1916 | Wilson | 16 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
17 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 17 | 3.12% | 1916 | Wilson |
18 | 48.85% | 1884 | Cleveland | 18 | 3.01% | 1892 | Cleveland |
19 | 48.63% | 1888 | Cleveland* | 19 | 3.00% | 1876 | Tilden* |
20 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 20 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
21 | 46.02% | 1892 | Cleveland | 21 | 1.46% | 1844 | Polk |
22 | 45.29% | 1856 | Buchanan | 22 | 0.83% | 1888 | Cleveland* |
23 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 23 | 0.57% | 1884 | Cleveland |
24 | 41.84% | 1912 | Wilson | 24 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
25 | 41.36% | 1824 | Jackson* | 25 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
Table 6: All General Elections where the DEMOCRAT won in the popular vote since the GOP became the other main player in US-electoral politics (1856-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 24.25% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD |
2 | 60.80% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD | 2 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
3 | 57.41% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD | 3 | 17.72% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD |
4 | 54.74% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD | 4 | 14.44% | 1912 | Wilson |
5 | 53.39% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD | 5 | 12.20% | 1856 | Buchanan |
6 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 6 | 9.95% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD |
7 | 50.92% | 1876 | Tilden* | 7 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
8 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 8 | 7.49% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD |
9 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 9 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
10 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 10 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
11 | 49.24% | 1916 | Wilson | 11 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
12 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 12 | 3.12% | 1916 | Wilson |
13 | 48.85% | 1884 | Cleveland | 13 | 3.01% | 1892 | Cleveland |
14 | 48.63% | 1888 | Cleveland* | 14 | 3.00% | 1876 | Tilden* |
15 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 15 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
16 | 46.02% | 1892 | Cleveland | 16 | 0.83% | 1888 | Cleveland* |
17 | 45.29% | 1856 | Buchanan | 17 | 0.57% | 1884 | Cleveland |
18 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 18 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
19 | 41.84% | 1912 | Wilson | 19 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
Table 7: All General Elections where the DEMOCRAT won in the popular vote in the last 100 years (1908-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 24.25% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD |
2 | 60.80% | 1936 | Roosevelt, FD | 2 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
3 | 57.41% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD | 3 | 17.72% | 1932 | Roosevelt, FD |
4 | 54.74% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD | 4 | 14.44% | 1912 | Wilson |
5 | 53.39% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD | 5 | 9.95% | 1940 | Roosevelt, FD |
6 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 6 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
7 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 7 | 7.49% | 1944 | Roosevelt, FD |
8 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 8 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
9 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 9 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
10 | 49.24% | 1916 | Wilson | 10 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
11 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 11 | 3.12% | 1916 | Wilson |
12 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 12 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
13 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 13 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
14 | 41.84% | 1912 | Wilson | 14 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
Table 8: All General Elections where the DEMOCRAT won in the popular vote in the last 60 years (1948-2008)
Rank | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
2 | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 2 | 8.52% | 1996 | Clinton |
3 | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 3 | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
4 | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 4 | 5.56% | 1992 | Clinton |
5 | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 5 | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
6 | 49.23% | 1996 | Clinton | 6 | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
7 | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 7 | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
8 | 43.01% | 1992 | Clinton | 8 | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
Table 9: All Open or Semi-Open General Elections since the inclusion of the electoral vote in the statistics (1824-2008)
Rank | Cat. | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Cat. | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | S | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | O | 26.17% | 1920 | Harding |
2 | O | 60.32% | 1920 | Harding | 2 | S | 25.22% | 1924 | Coolidge |
3 | O | 58.21% | 1928 | Hoover | 3 | S | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
4 | S | 56.42% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T | 4 | S | 18.83% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T |
5 | O | 55.18% | 1952 | Eisenhower | 5 | O | 17.42% | 1928 | Hoover |
6 | S | 54.02% | 1924 | Coolidge | 6 | S | 14.20% | 1836 | Van Buren |
7 | S | 53.37% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. | 7 | O | 12.20% | 1856 | Buchanan |
8 | O | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 8 | O | 10.85% | 1952 | Eisenhower |
9 | O | 52.66% | 1868 | Grant | 9 | O | 10.44% | 1824 | Jackson |
10 | O | 51.57% | 1908 | Taft | 10 | S | 10.13% | 1860 | Lincoln |
11 | O | 51.02% | 1896 | McKinley | 11 | O | 8.53% | 1908 | Taft |
12 | O | 50.92% | 1876 | Tilden* | 12 | S | 7.73% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. |
13 | O | 50.83% | 1852 | Pierce | 13 | O | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
14 | S | 50.79% | 1836 | Van Buren | 14 | O | 6.95% | 1852 | Pierce |
15 | S | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 15 | O | 5.33% | 1868 | Grant |
16 | S | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 16 | O | 4.79% | 1848 | Taylor |
17 | S | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 17 | S | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
18 | O | 49.54% | 1844 | Polk | 18 | O | 4.31% | 1896 | McKinley |
19 | O | 48.85% | 1884 | Cleveland | 19 | O | 3.00% | 1876 | Tilden* |
20 | S | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 20 | S | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
21 | O | 48.31% | 1880 | Garfield | 21 | O | 1.46% | 1844 | Polk |
22 | O | 47.28% | 1848 | Taylor | 22 | S | 0.70% | 1968 | Nixon |
23 | O | 45.29% | 1856 | Buchanan | 23 | O | 0.57% | 1884 | Cleveland |
24 | S | 43.42% | 1968 | Nixon | 24 | S | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
25 | O | 41.36% | 1824 | Jackson* | 25 | S | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
26 | S | 39.65% | 1860 | Lincoln | 26 | O | 0.10% | 1880 | Garfield |
Table 9: All Open or Semi-Open General Elections since the GOP and the DEMS have been the main competitors (1856-2008)
Rank | Cat. | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Cat. | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | S | 61.05% | 1964 | Johnson | 1 | O | 26.17% | 1920 | Harding |
2 | O | 60.32% | 1920 | Harding | 2 | S | 25.22% | 1924 | Coolidge |
3 | O | 58.21% | 1928 | Hoover | 3 | S | 22.58% | 1964 | Johnson |
4 | S | 56.42% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T | 4 | S | 18.83% | 1904 | Roosevelt, T |
5 | O | 55.18% | 1952 | Eisenhower | 5 | O | 17.42% | 1928 | Hoover |
6 | S | 54.02% | 1924 | Coolidge | 6 | O | 12.20% | 1856 | Buchanan |
7 | S | 53.37% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. | 7 | O | 10.85% | 1952 | Eisenhower |
8 | O | 52.87% | 2008 | Obama | 8 | S | 10.13% | 1860 | Lincoln |
9 | O | 52.66% | 1868 | Grant | 9 | O | 8.53% | 1908 | Taft |
10 | O | 51.57% | 1908 | Taft | 10 | S | 7.73% | 1988 | Bush, G. Sr. |
11 | O | 51.02% | 1896 | McKinley | 11 | O | 7.25% | 2008 | Obama |
12 | O | 50.92% | 1876 | Tilden* | 12 | O | 5.33% | 1868 | Grant |
13 | S | 50.08% | 1976 | Carter | 13 | S | 4.48% | 1948 | Truman |
14 | S | 49.72% | 1960 | Kennedy | 14 | O | 4.31% | 1896 | McKinley |
15 | S | 49.55% | 1948 | Truman | 15 | O | 3.00% | 1876 | Tilden* |
16 | O | 48.85% | 1884 | Cleveland | 16 | S | 2.06% | 1976 | Carter |
17 | S | 48.38% | 2000 | Gore* | 17 | S | 0.70% | 1968 | Nixon |
18 | O | 48.31% | 1880 | Garfield | 18 | O | 0.57% | 1884 | Cleveland |
19 | O | 45.29% | 1856 | Buchanan | 19 | S | 0.52% | 2000 | Gore* |
20 | S | 43.42% | 1968 | Nixon | 20 | S | 0.16% | 1960 | Kennedy |
21 | S | 39.65% | 1860 | Lincoln | 21 | O | 0.10% | 1880 | Garfield |
Table 10: ONLY Open General Elections since the GOP and the DEMS have been the main competitors (1856-2008)
Rank | Cat. | % | Year | Candidate | Rank | Cat. | Margin | Year | Candidate |
1 | O | 60.32% | 1920 | Harding | 1 | O | 26.17% | 1920 | Harding |
2 | O | 58.21% | 1928 | Hoover | 2 | O | 17.42% | 1928 | Hoover |
3 | O | 55.18% | 1952 | Eisenhower | 3 | O | 12.20% | 1856 | Buchanan |
4 | O | 52.88% | 2008 | Obama | 4 | O | 10.85% | 1952 | Eisenhower |
5 | O | 52.66% | 1868 | Grant | 5 | O | 8.53% | 1908 | Taft |
6 | O | 51.57% | 1908 | Taft | 6 | O | 7.27% | 2008 | Obama |
7 | O | 51.02% | 1896 | McKinley | 7 | O | 5.33% | 1868 | Grant |
8 | O | 50.92% | 1876 | Tilden* | 8 | O | 4.31% | 1896 | McKinley |
9 | O | 48.85% | 1884 | Cleveland | 9 | O | 3.00% | 1876 | Tilden* |
10 | O | 48.31% | 1880 | Garfield | 10 | O | 0.57% | 1884 | Cleveland |
11 | O | 45.29% | 1856 | Buchanan | 11 | O | 0.10% | 1880 | Garfield |
End-Ratings, Obama by percent:
Election Type | No. | Obama Ranking | Obama %ile | Candidate / Place under | Candidate /Place above |
All wins | 46 | 18 | 60.87 | Harrison / 1840 / 52.87% | Bush / 1988 / 53.37% |
1856 - all | 39 | 17 | 51.28 | Grant / 1868 / 52.66% | Bush / 1988 / 53.37% |
1908 - all | 26 | 14 | 46.15 | Taft / 1908 / 51.57% | Bush / 1988 / 53.37% |
1948 - all | 16 | 7 | 56.25 | Reagan / 1980 / 50.75% | Bush / 1988 / 53.37% |
All DEM wins | 25 | 8 | 68.00 | Tilden / 1872 / 50.92%** | Bush / 1988 / 53.37% |
1856- DEM wins | 19 | 6 | 68.42 | Tilden / 1872 / 50.92%** | Roosevelt / 1944 / 53.39% |
1908- DEM wins | 14 | 6 | 57.14 | Carter / 1976 / 50.08% | Roosevelt / 1944 / 53.39% |
1948- DEM wins | 8 | 2 | 75.00 | Carter / 1976 / 50.08% | Johnson / 1964 / 61.04% |
1856- O / SO | 21 | 8 | 61.90 | Grant / 1868 / 52.66% | Bush / 1988 / 53.37% |
1856- O only | 11 | 4 | 63.64 | Grant / 1868 / 52.66% | Eisenhower /1952 / 55.18% |
**Hayes won the election in an electoral college dispute/backfire, but Tilden won in the PV.
End Ratings, Obama by margin:
Election Type | No. | Obama Ranking | Obama %ile | Candidate / Place under | Candidate / Place above |
All | 46 | 27 | 41.30 | Pierce / 1852 / +6.95 | Roosevelt / 1944 / +7.49 |
1856 - all | 39 | 23 | 41.03 | McKinley / 1900 / +6.13 | Roosevelt / 1944 / +7.49 |
1908 - all | 26 | 18 | 30.77 | Clinton / 1992 / +5.56 | Roosevelt / 1944 / +7.49 |
1948 - all | 16 | 9 | 43.75 | Clinton / 1992 / +5.56 | Roosevelt / 1944 / +7.49 |
All DEM wins | 25 | 13 | 48.00 | Pierce / 1852 / +6.95 | Roosevelt / 1944 / +7.49 |
1856- DEM wins | 19 | 9 | 52.63 | Clinton / 1992 / +5.56 | Roosevelt / 1944 / +7.49 |
1908- DEM wins | 14 | 8 | 42.86 | Clinton / 1992 / +5.56 | Roosevelt / 1944 / +7.49 |
1948- DEM wins | 8 | 3 | 62.50 | Clinton / 1992 / +5.56 | Clinton / 1996 / +8.52 |
1856- O / SO | 21 | 11 | 47.61 | Grant / 1868 / +5.33% | Bush / 1988 / +7.73% |
1856- O only | 11 | 6 | 45.45 | Grant / 1868 / +5.33% | Taft / 1908 / +8.53% |
First, when looking at the end tables, how to interpret:
Example – the first election type, „All“, means all elections since the PV has been counted (since 1824). There have been 46 election cycles since then. In terms of winning percentage, Obama has place 18. In terms of EC win, he has place 27. The percentile is simple: 46-18=28. 28/46=60.87, which means that in terms of winning percentage, Obama is almost in the 61st percentile (or almost in the upper two thirds) of history. And for the category „All“, he is nestled between Harrison and Bush Sr. In terms of winning percent; his place is between Pierce and Roosevelt (FDR) in terms of winning margin.
You will see from the tables that the place above Obama shows much more stability: in terms of winning percent, the name Bush (Sr.) appears the most often, showing the closest correlation to Obama, going up the ladder. In terms of winning margin, the name Roosevelt (FDR) appears the most often, showing the closest correlation to Obama, going up the ladder.
The place below Obama is much less stable, but the overall percentage below Obama's that he comes closest to is: Grant (1868, 52.66%). The overal margin below Obama's that appears the most often is Bill Clinton from 1992.
Percentiles: one notices that Obama's percentile rises greatly when he is only compared to other DEMOCRATS. But all in all, this win put him on the average somewhere between the 50th percentile and the 66th percentile, roughly between the upper one-half and the upper one-third of all US elections.