Group Assessment Task Coding Sheet
(Quality Teaching in NSW Public Schools - An Assessment Practice Guide)
Element | Evidence: Coding Notes | Score |
1.1 Deep Knowledge | The task requires students to address the topic of threatened species and the factors that have lead to their threatened status and may lead to their extinction | 5 |
1.2 Deep Understanding | The task requires students to provide information and reasoning that indicates the status of the species | 5 |
1.3 Problematic Knowledge | The task requires students to look at the information from various points of view to determine the meaning | 4 |
1.4 Higher-Order Thinking | The majority of the task requires students to evaluate the information presented to them | 4 |
1.5 Metalanguage | The task does not require students to address language and how it works | 1 |
1.6 Substantive Communication | The task requires students to have a clear understanding of the concepts so that they can be presented | 4 |
2.1 Explicit Quality Criteria | There are clear statements about the quality of work and what is required to do well | 4 |
2.3 High Expectations | The task will challenge all students but does not encourage them to take risks in demonstrating their learning | 3 |
2.6 Student Direction | Students are free to present their decision in any way, they are not explicitly told how to present the information | 3 |
3.1 Background Knowledge | Students background knowledge is mentioned and required to successfully complete this task | 3 |
3.2 Cultural Knowledge | The task does not require students to recognise and value the cultural knowledge of diverse groups | 1 |
3.3 Knowledge Integration | Students are required to make at least one meaningful connection between learning areas (science and SOSE) | 3 |
3.5 Connectedness | The task gives students the opportunity to use their classroom knowledge outside the classroom | 4 |
3.6 Narrative | Narrative is not a feature of the task | 1 |