Random Entrance Greeting

Beginnings are too linear and sometimes misleading. You couldn't have picked a more opportune moment to jump into the cycle. But I guess you never really had a choice. You hear a story and expect that it will start at the beginning, the beginning of anything. This is my beginning to you. One of my names is Karm Forense. I live on the socially isolated outskirts of this continent’s largest city, Zin. This is my beginning to you.

Post Education

Some of us left to the Sprawl want knowledge. What happened here? Why this, not that? Others seem to relish the situation they've created for themselves. Their graffiti reads, "The Sprawl is all" and "The Individual is the Enemy." I can explain their behavior only by exploring mine for it is their opposition that places what I think. If there were none complacent, were would I fit?

Creating a Voice?

Yesterday, I met with Maryam and Jaynel at Stein’s Water Bar. There is a water bar sprinkled throughout every corner of the Sprawl but most of them are drive-thru. You can actually go in and sit down to drink your water at Stein’s. That's why we go there.

Maryam and Jaynel both live in Zin’s Southern Core and come to the Sprawl for work. It’s an interesting reversal and I imagine the traffic during their commute to be light. The majority of Zin's employers are based in and around the Core. The only businesses in the Sprawl are Sheppet food restaurants, grocery stores, and churches. There are other stores, too – you can’t take a piss without wetting someone selling something – but most Sprawlers choose to work the Core. Invariably, the para’d work the Core.

"We want to make a documentary,” said Jaynel.
“About what?”
"About the Schism,” she answered.
"Maryam sipped her water, anxiously tapped her toes and let her gaze flit about the other people occupying Stein's.
“Why? Everyone knows what happened.” I took a drink.
"Maryam spoke up quickly, her hands flailing about in emphasis. “No one knows about the S.D’s though.”
“What the hell?” I jumped.
“Jaynel giggled. “She fell asleep in the bathtub this morning and the caffeinated soap fell in. Now she’s up and in everyone's face.”
“And not going to be sleeping for a while either," Maryam spouted.
“Speaking of sleeping,” I sipped then spoke, “Last night, I had this dream, and it's not the first one, that-”
“No, no. Documentary,” Maryam interrupted. “Subject, please. Subject.”
“So, what’s the subject? Why am I here?”
Looking at the ground, Jaynel said, “We want you to script the voice-over.”

Blame

Last night, while driving home from my Visual Literature class, I was delayed by an accident. On the Corner of 9th and Cress, just before the Safety Hill Compound Apartment Complex, two cars had run into each other. One of the drivers, a younger man, was yelling at the Concerned Operations Officer handling the scene. The other (a lady) was obviously para’d. The C.O.O. looked to be administering some field tests on her yet she just stared ahead. The front of her Suburban Assault Vehicle was completely thrashed but the damage seemed minimal in comparison to the man’s vehicle. From the looks of it, she had run over the hood of his car, squashing it. Had he been driving any faster she probably would have run him right over as well. Fucking para’ds.

I know what pop diagnosis has to say about S.D. but I don’t buy it. I’ve lived in the Sprawl off and on for close to ten years and I’m not para’d. Some fringe research claims that Sprawl Disease is all in the head yet the I-doctors can do nothing for them. I’m divided. On the one hand I’ve got sympathy for para’ds. On the other – they piss me off. They can respond to their environment while being completely oblivious to it. Take tonight’s accident as an example: that para’d lady – she runs over this guy’s car and the C.O.O. can’t even get her to answer questions or take tests. Yet, and here’s the kicker, if the officer let her she could get in her SAV, drive home, punch the proper wall code to get in, and walk right to her kitchen to make herself a late-night snack. So, is she responsible for this accident? She won’t talk to the officer or the guy she ran over. They don’t exist to her. If the officer runs her in, she’ll get tested, confirmed, and medicated for S.D. (if she isn’t already).
 

The Butterfly in the Morning

I’m lying in bed, reciting this to my comp, thinking about last night. I had the dream. The dream always begins the same, with me waking up and getting out of bed. Then I go into the bathroom, kiss a man lying next to me, and hop into the shower. Mind you, I’m doing all of this in a completely foreign environment. Yet it’s me doing it. It’s Karm.

The people I meet with and talk with in these dreams don't call me Karm. But when I look into a mirror it’s that familiar, reversed image that stares back. I have a vague sense of control while having these particular dreams. I can do what I want although most times I simply let go and watch as the dream takes me. When I first started having them, they didn’t take me anywhere really novel. I’d begin the dream as I always do, by getting out of bed, and then sometimes I’d be in a car, in an office, in a classroom, in someone else’s home. In short, nothing extended nor that interesting. Lately, however, when I wake up, I can remember no other dreams but this one. And there is only this one dream – not several instances of a dream experienced throughout the night over a period of time. The dream is linear and follows some narrative. I go to sleep, have the dream, wake up, and when I fall asleep the next night - the dream will pick right back up like it’s a new day, with the dream-me getting out of bed. It’s so – INCOMING CALL FROM TOTH, JAYNEL. ACCEPT?

“Yes. Hello.”
“What are you doing up? It’s early.”
“So why are you calling then? I had trouble sleeping.”
“I expected to leave a message. I couldn’t sleep either.”
“I had that weird dream again. I was at some party and I ran into this guy that I had a huge crush on in prior school, even though I wasn’t into guys in prior school, and-”
“Oooo, was it Sincy Rema? What’s with the homo-dreams?”
“I don’t know. It was someone that I don’t know at all. Well, in my dream I knew him. And I wanted to hang out with him some more but I just got up and left the party and came home and the whole time I kept saying to me in the dream – go back, go back. Then I went to sleep in the dream and woke up here. I was just wiring some stuff about it so I could go over it later.”
“You’re recording this?”
“Yeah. I’m in bed.”
“Hmmm . . . well, I just called to see if you’ve given any thought to doing the voice-over. We’re trying to get going on this project and want a sense of who’s to be on the team.”
“I’ve given it some thought, but not a lot. I’m just not certain I want to– ”
“I know, I know. But that’s why Maryam and I thought to ask you. We know how you feel about what happened.”
“But everybody knows what happened then. The history’s available. That’s my hesitation.”
“We think there’s more to it than that. I’m not sure any of us are being told the truth. I mean, when the Femels came to the Core – why did everyone here instantly become so hostile? And what about S.D., huh? What about all those para’ds? You know, before the Schism there was no Sprawl and before the Sprawl there was no S.D.”
“I’m not sure what to say.”
“Just think about it, OK? We really want you to be a part of this. It’s important. I’m going to shower. Call me later.”
“B–” – CALL ENDED.

And that’s that. I need to eat.
Upload.

The Schism Pt. I

Looking at a blank page is one of the most intimidating things I can think of. It’s a place where all possibilities exist and where one is forced to choose or stagnate. Choose or stagnate.

Thinking about the history of Zin’s Core and the circumstances surrounding it’s fracture – I get trapped there, in the past.

I was 11 or 12 when the first wave of Femels came to Zin from the Burning West. There were probably 150 of them and Concerned Operations immediately placed them into containment. After testing them for contagions and finding them healthy, C.O. set up a temp-shelter for them in a North Central complex. Then, Intelligence began to study them and soon began to teach them how to acclimate to life in Zin. Zin is dense – 30 million people in a 50 mile square area - and I can imagine how intimidating it must have been for those first few Femels, having been displaced from the open West, to try to live in such close quarters. But they had no choice, really. The West, their home, had caught fire, giving way to this forced Diaspora.

So we taught. We taught them how to move about in the city; taught them how to think like individuals, not to take “no” for an answer. We taught them how to be like us and never once paid attention to what ideas they’d brought with them from the West. We never paid much attention to them at all. Until more arrived.

The next group came in a bundle of 1,000. More and more began to arrive daily. All told, I think that close to 1,000,000 Femels migrated to Zin in just over 2 years’ time. Thinking pragmatically, C.O. moved them all to North Central, effectively relocating any of the prior inhabitants to other sections of Zin. The goal was simple – those Femels that understood Zin culture would be more effective at indoctrinating the neophytes. This would relieve some of the pressure being placed upon Intelligence to instantiate educational programs amongst the immigrants. This relocation set the foundation for the trouble to come.

Reduction

This is my job: looking at page after page of computer generated lists of data discrepancies and tracking down the points of error. So, the computer shows me the error and maybe it’s Jones in Accounting or Smith in Customer Service or Adams in Human Resources? I access Jones/Smith/Adams’s data logs, match up the dates, and then send J/S/A the error page with a memo to J/S/A instructing them to re-enter. That’s it. That’s my job. My company has over 15,000 employees doing data entry (a third of which turn over monthly), each inputting 3 pages a minute (on average). The potential for error is vast, or so they say, and I have yet to understand the rationale for having people do this job. But, they pay me.

All my friends yelled at me. I think they were more scared that they too might go that same route then they were upset with me for getting a term job.

Term job. Being terminal: The room I work in is barely lit and there are rows upon rows of low recliners. Our monitor lenses hang from the ceiling like oxygen masks in some ancient, about-to-crash airplane. We plug in to our in and outs, lie down, and work for 7 hours while caffeinated pheromones hang in the air, keeping us alert. The company doesn't like to have caffeine running through the IVs - another policy I don't understand. There are 3,000 of us in first-tier data check, 1,000 in second. Terminals.

Senses in a Blender

Last night, I took the train down to the Core to feel my friend Aesop’s band. It was more intense than I expected. I arrived at the performing hall, paid the rental fee for the T-suit then changed into it at one of the grimy stalls outside of the main room. Surprisingly enough, the damn thing fit. I’ve no shoulders or chest but have awfully long arms so it’s hard to find form-fitting clothing and it kind of defeats the suit’s purpose if the tactile contacts are out of place. So, happily geared up, I wandered into the hall, turned my suit on, and looked at the myriad people around me. Those without T-suits sported the latest fashions. I have never understood fashions and seem to always be out of step with them. Once, when I was fifteen and in prior school, I wore a hat that had been popular a few years earlier. Mistake. Got verbally abused through the day. Two years later, every body and their mother wore those hats. No matter. Most everyone here had on a dark gray T-suit, which rendered us fashionably neutral.

As the first band began to tune up I spotted my old friend Rique. Rique and I used to run dust out from the Core to the South Sprawl. Years ago, dust was a popular way for para’ds to self-medicate. Unfortunately, all it ended up doing was prolonging the inevitable. I walked over to Rique.

“KK, how’re you?”
“Ahh dayum – Karmo – long time no see. You need dust?”
I smiled. “No, no dustin’ in this suit. Who’re you here with?”
“I’m solo, brolo. Just waiting for this showlo to golo. You?”
“Same. Aesop said the band is supposed to go on at 22 or so. I’m surprised to see you here. I heard you moved up Northwest.”
Rique didn’t respond right away. I thought maybe he hadn’t heard me. Then he spoke.
“Tiz has S.D., Karm.” The words rang hollow in the otherwise full room.
“Oh man. Rique, I’m sorry, guy. What the fuck happened?”
“I wish I knew. All I know is that dust don’t do shit for it. She’s...it’s, ah man, she’s slipping.”

He didn’t have time to tell me anything else. The music had begun. The first chord hit me like the blast from a cold shower and I instinctually jumped back. A T-suit’s contacts pick up on the sound waves, transforming them into sensations of minor hot or major cold, sharp pleasure or flat pain, and everything in between. Before going on, the band has the choice of tuning the suits to deliver certain types of stimulus or they can allow it to be more of a random affair. I’m not sure what Aesop’s band had done but I’d never felt music like that before. The band didn’t let that initial chord touch us for long before the rest of the song came on furiously brisk. It was a wake-up call. Tiz sick. Another one down. Rique had move up into the Core to try to counter the disease. Why isn’t there any progress being made?

All You Need Is Love?

I've taken some time off to fall in love. Now I'm dealing with the logistics of this most comforting of contradictory states. I had recorded a long screed about the nature of compromise in a loving relationship but the Company scrambled the upload. I was docked two hours. To avoid a repeat of the process I've begun coming in before the Restraint Managers get on-site so I can get back to regular recording.
Anyway, love's the reason for the lag in updates. I've been learning time management skills insofar as how best to balance my desire for solitude and its percs with my desire to be with Vale and its percs. She's learning about this too and doesn't particularly like it. In response to my detachment, she's labeled me the "emotional void." I'd like to tell her all about the Vassic notion of separating feelings and emotions; how that inspires my thinking and acting. She won't want to hear it though. My fear is that she takes my desire to spend time apart as a personal affront when, in fact, she doesn't factor at all into that desire. And maybe that's her fear.

This Is What You Get

I've been cleaning. I am cleaning. What you find is a debate along the lines of: should this stay or should this go? Cleansing.

Last night, Vale and I went to Simpy's for some tall glasses of H20. Simpy's is all right for a Sprawl establishment. They're open much later than anyplace needs to be around here. Vale was feeling down and out (insight-might she be experiencing the onset of S.D.? Strike that-she's feeling something, even if it's crappy, so it’s not S.D.) We sat, talked about what I'm sure I can't recall at this instance. I'm distracted. Cleaning. Vale hates when I talk and my heart's not in it. I tell her that when I talk my heart is never in it. Speaking is a plague to me. Further, the stereotype that speaking is more, more, more - something! - than writing...I don't buy into. If you want me to actually communicate anything then don't let me speak.

I'm starting school again this coming week. Three more quarters and I'll have my cert and with it a ticket to break from the Company. Then, if I pass the preliminaries, I'll be put on the list for focal implants. Wow. I just found an old message log between Cyrine and me. Four years ago. Vale's right. I shouldn't be doing this while distracted. I'll probably have to do some heavy editing later. Four years already?

Durn Edaemr Standing

The dream again. I haven’t had it for a few months. I woke up at half past two this morning, sweating. The dream’s story is hardly worth repeating. I was driving, going to the grocery store, watching a sell-box (although in the dream the word used was “television”), reading a book. But the effect, the feeling, my presence in the dream was close to absolute. For instance, I heard things not as a disinterested observer, but as a full participant. Biting into an apple, I could hear myself chewing while breathing through my nose. My presence was close to absolute, yet the me/not me split was still apparent. The dream me used different words for things that I would have called by another name. Also, the technology of the dream world is completely external. No headpieces, LCD contact lenses, inner-ear phones. Why does dreaming such an environment disconcert me so? I’ve had far stranger, more frightening, more stimulating dreams. Why does this mundane, repeat episode of sleeplife get to me?

There isn’t much else to get out this morning. I received a very strange message from Salva this morning. Another example of miscommunication I hope. I hope. The possibility of miscommunication exists in every social endeavor. In artistic endeavors, miscommunication seems the standard. If I compose a poem with a certain intent and you, as a random observer, fail to pick up on that intent – or better still, you pick up on something unintended by me – that’s OK, it enlarges the work. There’s nothing personal about not “getting” a piece of art, or “getting” out of the art something different than everyone else.

If, however, I compose a specific message to you, as a particular individual, and my meaning is completely misconstrued, that’s not OK. Such a misunderstanding ruins the communication, especially when the message, written with sincere, good intent, is taken as a thing malicious. Further, it soils the dialogue, as the participants must backtrack to determine what happened to bring offense to the person. Can we ever truly know what another person means? Probably not, but hopefully we can learn to refine our communication to a point where we can transmit our meaning to our best ability. Can we begin to view conversation as an art form open to interpretation? No. It isn’t conducive to enjoyable, personal communication (although it is an interesting thought experiment.)

The possibility of miscommunication across the board frightens me. Am I misunderstanding my dream?

Who's Head is This?

“So, why are you here? Are you taping this?"

“Yes. I hope that’s all right. It’s a project I’m working on.”

“This talk is supposed to be of a confidential nature. Your recording may violate doctor/patient confidentiality.”

“That only applies if I mind that my session is made available; a moot point if I’m the one doing the recording.”

“Fair enough. So, why are you here?”

“Because Caleb said you wanted to see me.”

“I wanted to see you together, Mark.”

“I thought it might be best if we spoke alone first. I wanted you to form your own opinion before you saw us together.”

“Is there something about the two of you together that you thought might influence my opinion?”

“I’m not certain but seeing as how you’ve already heard Caleb’s view of me I thought you might like to hear my view of me, uninterrupted.”

“And what view is that?”

“I’m not sure I follow...”

“Your view of you – what might that be?”

“Isn’t that for you to determine? I can tell you that I’m hardly as out of touch with my feelings as he has told me, and presumably you, that he thinks I am. I feel confident in my ability to recognize a feeling as it arises, pinpoint what causes that feeling, and either choose to act on it or simply look at it for what it is.”

“And what is a feeling?”

“An intuition - as opposed to an emotion, which, akin to the Stoic ethicists, I take to be an assent to a feeling. Feelings are natural, healthy, expected and may be a unique instance of social structure instigating a series of bio-electro-chemical reactions. Emotions I have yet to categorize as existent outside of a given social context, but I do think I can extert some control over them.”

“Go on.”

“For instance – when I tell you that I’m about to marry my cousin what’s the first feeling you get? Revolt, disgust, something along those lines? That’s how I feel about it, anyway. But were we 14th century European aristocrats or belonged to an Egyptian dynasty we’d hardly blink an eye at the revelation. To use a more contemporary, literary example: the characters Ashley and Melanie Wilkes from Gone With the Wind are cousins who feel romantic love for each other. Their society condones those feelings and, consequently, their resultant emotions. I think across the human spectrum feelings are feelings. Love is love is love is love. The same goes for hate, anger, sadness, etc. Societal expectation as to how one should deal with those feelings will affect the emotional expression of them. If I fall in love with my cousin I would be conflicted. Love in one hand, disgust in the other. The love I feel regardless. The disgust is due to my particular society's insistence that wedding one's relatives is wholly inappropriate. This may be a poor example but I'm reading Gone With the Wind right now and I'm having a rough time with those characters' love for each other.”

“Those feelings are what we are trying to get you to express. Whatever your label, Caleb just wants you to express them.”

“I do express them. Just not in ways that he accepts or probably even recognizes. By the time my feelings get to the point of expression, they’ve become obsolete to me. If something makes me angry, instead of immediately expressing, “I’m angry,” I will look at what it is that’s made me angry and nine times out of ten I find that I’m angry as a result of the expectation that this type of situation should make me angry. Immediately, I question why I should be expected to feel this way and look at the variables coming into play. Maybe I’m hardwired to be quick to anger. Maybe I’ve also been empowered by an unspoken social philosophy of self-importance. Maybe I’m tired of always being passed up by people more aggressive than I am. More than likely, it isn’t one reason in isolation. It’s a combination of all these influences and predispositions working together in pre-conscious concert to cause this particular feeling as a gut reaction to this particular instance. Now, I’ve felt the feeling and examined it – I find responding to it in most cases unnecessary.”

“That works fine in some situations. What about negative situations where a personal relationship is involved? If you don’t express your feelings, are you really relating to that person? Similarly, what about positive feelings, expressing love, happiness, pleasure?”

“Well, first off, I said that in most cases I find an emotional expression of my feelings superfluous. Further, the binaries "negative" and "positive" are relative and situational. Sometimes, love is a curse and anger a gift. Should those feelings not be avoided or respectively nutured if they manifest in a contradictory manner? But, I get your point. In the case of anger at a person with whom I am personally involved – family, friend, co-worker, or lover – unless the situation occurs repeatedly, I feel no desire to express my anger with them. If it is a recurring issue, I’ll discuss it without qualm. When I am sad, I will mope. I might even cry. In the case of "positive" feelings, I do the same thing to a lesser degree. I find it more appropriate to express "positive" feelings as the result seems to be the generation of "positive" feelings in others. I think positivity should be cultivated as often as possible. I’d be lying though if I didn’t say that I examine the context of positive feelings as well. I just find that, like most people, I don’t focus so much on feelings during the happy times. When I'm feeling good, I don't bother much with the intricate details. I'm aware of what's causing the pleasure, and focus on extending it. I tend to keep three axioms in mind while living my life.”

“Which are?”

“‘Everything in moderation.’ ‘This too shall pass.’ ‘The unexamined life is not worth living.’”

“Do you think that these axioms lead to a healthy, fulfilling, and connective life?”

“Well, I have no problem making or keeping friends. I think that for the most part people enjoy my company. I’m very happy with being me. The problems arise when I try to explain to people the thought process that I just unloaded on you. People tend to find it too analytical or too cold or some other such adjective.”

“And you don’t think that?”

“Not at all. I feel things to the core of my being. I am affected by existence and relish every maddening second of it. It’s central to my humanity and my person. I have a vested interest in why I feel the way I do. I’m not content with only feeling then letting that feeling out to the world. I want to know why and when I come to see why, I either let the feeling dissipate or express it if it will improve or help a situation. Did he tell you about his labeling me, “the emotional void?”

“Why do you think that is?”

“I wish I knew. The only question about my feelings that he asks me is, ‘What’s wrong?’ Most times, nothing is wrong. Maybe I'm tired or just in a pensive mood. When we speak of specific situations he doesn’t typically like where our conversation leads. I don’t think he wants to hear my view because, for a number of reasons, hearing my view of existence causes him distress. This may be the root of our problem. As for individual situations though, it seems he expects me to react rather than respond to them. I’ve asked him what it is that causes him to label me "emotional void", but he can’t give me specifics - only a general feeling that that is how he thinks I am.”

“Well, you've just presented yourself that way to me. You've just said that you don't really tend to express emotion. I think it’s safe to say he wants that tendency to change.”

“Well, what I said was I don't express emotion in a way that he accepts or recognizes as an expression. But, that he wants me to give him more emotion is what I am afraid of. That’s the thing, though – I have no problem telling him I love him (which I do), being intimate with him, or expressing other pleasures that I feel around him. Further, it seems that a big part of his questioning of me – my motivations, thinking, etc. – only arises at times when we’re apart. Rarely do these issues arise when we’re in each other’s company. Granted, that may be due to his aversion for lengthy discussion about some of my feelings on the subjects of personal identity, life, death, etc. for fear of the possible unsettling of his mind. I'm fine with that, but I’m unclear as to what I need to do, in particular, better or different if I'm unable to speak with him about where I'm coming from. Caleb has advised me that one possible remedy to his perception of me is that I ‘pay attention.’ This is quite easy for me to do so as it is imperative to my health that I remain in constant awareness of my own bodily state. It’s also easy for me to pay attention to other people. As a writer I feel it my duty to be a keen observer of the world around me. I take from his advice, however, that I need to pay attention to him. That seems fine advice for any relationship and I follow it to the best of my ability although I find it next to impossible to judge from his outward displays any of his inner workings. Maybe this will become possible as we spend more time together. I’m not sure. He lives with a great amount of physical pain and I think he hides it quite well; enough for me to forget about it at times. Also, he doesn’t immediately tell me when something I say or do upsets him. He waits until two, three days/maybe a week later to bring the issue up and by this time, it’s causing him much more distress than it admittedly caused him in the first place. That makes him seem a bit hypocritical in terms of his desire that I express myself more often, but I don't mind the hypocrisy all that much. So, what do I do?"

“Well, that's what we're here for. If it matters, you just keep talking and work though it. A loving relationship is a working relationship.”

“I know. I know.”

There Is No Grass On the Other Side

“And what about the soul?”

“Well, to be blunt, it’s a myth. A soul is a convenient term used to describe the hope that the self continues beyond bodily death. I fail to see how this is remotely possible, let alone desirable.”

“Not possible? I’m surprised to hear you claim that, what with all your talk of the ‘mysteries of existence.’”

“Why? The mysteries inherent in being alive have nothing to do with debunking things that are imaginary. I’m all for imagination – but not at the expense of dealing with what’s in front of you. The soul is a hope and a false hope at that. You cannot divorce the person from the body. Your self is as much others’ view of you as it is your view. The self is a web of social and biological relationships – the memories of your mother’s love or hate, the way certain chemicals are behaving in your body and brain, your own restraint when it comes to the desire to punch your neighbor for trashing your yard. Strip away the context of your life and you’ll find that, while something is there, observing, it isn’t recognizable as having personal identify. Self is contextual.”

“Couldn’t that observer be the soul?”

“Not in the conventional sense of the word. First of all, I don’t think that observer exists outside of a living brain. And, if it did, you wouldn’t point to consciousness stripped of body and disposition and say, ‘Ooh, there’s Grandpa!’ Why do you think we humans place such high value on our lives?”

“Because life is inherently valuable?”

“Life is inherently valuable in fostering further life. But we don’t really think of ourselves as being a part of the web of life, do we? No, we value life because, aware of it or not, each of us knows that every person, broadly defined, is unique and finite. We will all cease to exist as individuals.”

“That’s fairly dismal.”

“On the contrary, I find it liberating and further motivation to make the most of my time.”

“So, we all cease to... ‘exist as individuals’?”

“Sure, ashes to ashes, dust to dust through and through. All the atoms in my body come from all over the universe. In a hundred years, they’ll be spread back out all over the universe. What was once a part of me, which was once a part of - what, a star, another person? – will become one with the earth or a plant or an animal or perhaps another person. In a hundred billion years, if our cosmologists are correct, every atom will be squeezed back into a pinhole singularity of matter or we will continue to spread out over this infinite canvas. How does that old song go? I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together. What’s great is that we have the capacity to recognize this. Though many of us choose not to.”

“But, Mark, how does this recognition help in everyday life? It seems paralytic and essentially meaningless.”

“Where is the meaning in the comforting myths – that something else has control of your life so any responsibility is lifted from your shoulders? That there is a place where nothing bad exists? How do you then recognize good? What is the meaning of ‘God’s plan’? You get the answer: ‘God’s plan’ is meaningful. That’s it. You can't understand it. But it's there and, take our word for it, meaningful. Look at the Intelligent Design theory: We live in a world that has been constructed with a sense of intention and coherency. Well, that’s great – it puts some meaning in my life. Now I have an abstract entity to blame for all my troubles. Oh, wait, I can’t do that? Oh yeah, I can credit the entity for all the good stuff, but I have to blame my species for the bad. That’s some comfort.”

“That's not necessarily what I.D. theorists says. They say there's a creator, but they don't qualify it. Besides, not everyone wants to see it your way. They’re not as strong as you to be able to live without faith.”

“It’s not about strength. I think it takes more strength to believe in ID after getting the world news from your morning paper. The issue here is one of making meaning or taking meaning. Instead of condemning the world and humankind in expectation of the after party, why not leave the world better than you found it? You know the world will be here long after you’re gone. Whether “you” will be around when your body quits is questionable. So I say act as though this is the only chance you have to do anything meaningful. I think any god would understand. Anyway, how needy is a god that requires your devotion?”

The Schism Pt. II

The Femels came to Zin in droves and C.O., thinking it would be better for community building, corralled them into one section of the city. The resentment was strong and I suppose understandable. I’ve never been one to get too attached to any particular place but I’ve known plenty of people who have. And there were plenty of people who were attached to that location. Rather than petition the government, people began to hurt Femels. What gets me is – the Femels took it all in stride. It’s almost as though they expected some sort of backlash to their migration. So, the isolated violence and prejudice, they took. If you’ve ever known a violent person, one who’s really caught up in his or her own righteousness, you know that in infuriates them when their target responds passively. A person prone to violence expects to be dealt with violently. Not doing so confuses and frustrates them. This confusion and frustration split the displaced citizens of Zin into two reactionary camps. The first group, realizing that Zin authority was accountable for this situation, decided to leave the city and any further whims of its governing body. (Rarely are such decisions made in full light of all the evidence.) The second group decided to take back what they felt was theirs. (It’s too bad you can’t hear my voice because that last line was delivered in a fitting, ominous tone.)

Recursive Thought Loop

The voice in your head begins to stick. It stops and repeats from the beginning. First happens with song lyrics and snippets of statements. Progresses to such a point where there are thought pictures to go along with the voices. There's no longer just your one, familiar head voice either. May be a conversation or a cacophony of sound. But no matter what it turns into you're stuck. Not to the exclusion of the outside world, though. The thought loop overlays the world without. Imagine attempting to focus under such sensory assault. Eventually, the loop replaces any outside stimulus. Then the S.D. becomes catatonic and under C.O. orders, euthanised. "No Function, No Support." - the motto of C.O. Health.

Admission

If, while reading this, you’ve come to think I may be losing my mind I wouldn’t altogether disagree. I’d probably use different terminology but a loon by any other name is still a loon. I haven’t necessarily “lost” my mind so much as I’ve gained another. That’s the only way I can explain what you’ve been witness to.
Here’s what I think and you may take this thought and wrap your pretty little mind around it:

My dream – I’m him. And, for the sake of argument and necessary balance, in his dream – he’s me.
Do pronouns even work in this situation?

Follow me.
Say I exist in one aspect of a holographic reality. Might not another instance of I exist in another aspect of that hologram, physically the same yet surviving in a different context? Hell, to take this line of thinking further, might not infinite I’s exist in an infinity of aspects of a holographic, infinite universe? All these I’s, myself included, when looked at separately are living distinct lives. Taken as a whole, however, all our particles are functioning wholly together and in unison although those functions are manifest differently depending on context. For instance, I eat my breakfast and simultaneously all the myriad I’s eat something – breakfast, lunch, each other, doesn't matter. The manifestation of physical (or psychological) hunger is contextual. When I walk, we all walk. But, when I lie down to sleep – what if one of those I’s is just beginning to wake?

Confusion on the Other End

“ – but in the dream I’m dating a girl!”

“That’s not altogether uncommon.”

“Still, it’s uncomfortable. Christ, if I told Caleb he’d flip. Hell, even my dads would flip! I can already hear them, ‘Son, you mate with women. You don’t date them.’”

“Is that how you feel about it? You know sometimes dreams are telling us things about ourselves that we don’t readily see or think about in our waking lives.”

“This isn’t like a normal dream though. It doesn’t have that surreal air about it. Well, it’s surreal that I’d be dating a girl in my dream but I don’t think even that would bother me so much if it didn’t seem so real or so normal. I’m there, doing what I’m doing, and it doesn’t even strike me as odd until I happen to wake up.”

“And what are you doing, other than dating a female?”

“Oh hell, I don’t know. Last night I dreamt that I was lying on this couch thing, looking at the ceiling and watching/listening to an older man lecture on perspective.”

“The man was on the ceiling?”

“Oh, no. I was looking at the ceiling because I needed a blank surface. The image was in my line of vision no matter where I looked. If I looked at the floor, the image would be viewable over the texture of the carpet. The man’s voice was in my head, too. Well, I guess it was all in my head, but you know what I mean. Anyway, I’d get up to go to the bathroom and the lecture would follow me – or rather, I would be following it because the image would always be in front of me. It’s kind of funny watching your piss flow into and through someone’s head.”

“Sure. But none of this struck you as odd or out of the ordinary?”

“Not a bit. Not until I woke up and thought, ‘What the hell was that all about?’”

“Where does the girl come in?”

“When? Sometimes she comes over and we make love. Other times we argue. She’s a part of whatever this life is I’m dreaming of.”

“Hmmm...”

“What? What’s that mean – the cryptic sound of contemplation?”

“That was just an interesting phrasing you used – ‘this life I’m dreaming of.’ I think it says a lot.”

“Well? Could you please clue me in?”

20 Questions

“What might be right for you, may not be right for some”

1. Does that mean I’m always right?
2. Does it work in practice?
3. In a relative existence, I’m always right – yet so are you – and then what does right mean?
4. How does being tolerant make you feel?
5. Can you build a life on a relative foundation?
6. How far will you take the principle of toleration - Toleration Uber Alles?
7. Is toleration an inherent feature of the human being?
8. Should we all “just get along?”
9. Does might equal right or logic equal legit?
10. At what might does toleration become undesirable?
11. If we don’t tolerate is our only option to indoctrinate?
12. From where do you get your ideas of right and wrong?
13. Is there any benefit to intolerance?
14. Has your community adopted a tolerant attitude?
15. Would you tolerate your government’s attempt to disrupt another country’s oppressive regime?
16. Would you tolerate another country’s attempt to disrupt your country’s oppressive regime?
17. Would you tolerate your neighbor abusing his or her spouse?
18. Would you tolerate your neighbor abusing your spouse?
19. Are there standards of relativity?
20. Toleration is a must, yet how do we go about it?

Practice, pracTice, practicE
The capital shifts
But does the emphasis?

Either the dream has become less frequent or I have become less observant. Typically a bastion of relief and escape, my nights no longer provide anything other than an excuse to lie down for a few hours. I’m uncertain how much sleep I’m getting. My body is piping up here and asking me to tell you, “None whatsoever.”

So if my hypothesis about the dream is valid, my connection to one of the other me's is tenuous at best. My subconscious must be as exhausted as my conscious not to pay attention. Hmmm....can a subconscious not pay attention?

Sometimes We Laugh

Why do we wage war?
1 – Fear
2 – Unwillingness to change a mindset or way of life
3 – Megalomania/Desire to further interests of a particular set of people (group megalomania)
[There may be more and I’ll record them as they occur to me.]

3. Often, one country wages war because their leader is a power hungry dictator (sometimes even in the guise of a casual, god-fearing simpleton). Check your history tapes. Sometimes a leader convinces his public that he or she is a god. A population fighting for a god fights without doubt. Such people have nothing to lose, because the afterlife’s bliss promised by their god awaits them.

2. One country may view another as representing a threat to well-established cultural norms. Rather than undergo a public dialogue with the other in an attempt to educate and explore differences, the leaders of the steadfast country demonize the other. This is done overtly or subtly. The result is the same – the formation of public bias.

1. This is the foundation of all other reasons. Fear is a concern. Why are leaders afraid? They’re afraid to lose power or they’re afraid to change their minds. Sometimes the fear is more fundamental. The fear is of death. The fear of death, however, should be equated with defensive action, not offensive.

What we have in Zin is a city divided into fifty governing factions according to population density, economic viability, etc. Heads of the factions meet routinely to discuss Zin’s functions. One of these factions, Southwest 5, happens to be four times larger than any other faction. What the head of SW5 wants, Zin usually gets. When the head of SW5 is afraid, Zin usually suffers. SW5 declared war on North Central and the Femels occupying it. They multiplied too fast and fear of another displacement soon rose throughout SW5. Thus, war.

I Ain't No Goddamned Son of a Bitch. You Better Think About It, Baby.

We have a ritual called 'The Day of Love.' On this day, you make every effort to show your partner your affection for them or you suffer unimaginable torture. What happens if you equally love the world and everything in it? Well, you may:
1 - tell your partner, "in the grand scheme of existence, my love for you is equal to my love for that spider dangling above your head." Between your partner and the spider, life is.
Result: Your partner slaps you and calls you an insensitive, uncaring lout.
2- tell your partner, "I love all the world, but that love is subsumed by my love for you."
Your partner is the Other that is All.
Result: Your partner hugs you with relief that your view of romantic love is as narrow as theirs.
3 - tell your partner, "Life is good, love makes it better and I'm happy we're together."
An honest expression enhances relations.
Result: Your partner says, "Oh, that's sweet," while hoping for a more direct instance of ego gratification.

Unfortunately, the Day of Love seems to feed people's insecurities. "If I don't make the appropriate gesture, they won't think I love them," or, "If they don't make the gesture I think I deserve, they probably don't love me," or, "I don't have anyone to share this day with. What's wrong with me?" or, "Fuck the Day of Love! Who needs to show care?"
Fear again. Easy to spot, hard to eliminate.
If I may quote a wiser person:
"Which is the most universal human characterisic: fear or laziness?"
We move from love to fear and back again - every day should be a day of love.

The Gated Past

When I drive these streets at night, moons low above me, the weight of where I am presses upon me. The gated developments contrast directly with the looming entertainment complexes. One warns "keep out" while the other begs "come out!" When we're though being entertained, it's time to retreat to safety. These developments house thousands. Thousands of people living in such close proximity yet lacking any presence. I'm the first to admit I don't know any of my neighbors.

Despite this, I don't feel our society is somehow worse off. I remember times before the Schism and I remember those times fondly. But that's probably the case for the vast majority of people who reflect upon their lives. We have a tendency to think of the past as "better" and a model for how life should be. Things are different now, that's all, different. The children that grow up here and now, knowing nothing else, will probably look back with warm regard upon all that I see as glaring disconnect.

I'm finding it harder and harder to judge anything on its own terms. What does it mean to judge a thing on its own terms? Does any person, place, or thing exist on its own terms, outside of a given context, separate from all that it influences and that influences it? And what of my experience of that thing? I cannot help but allow my own terms and feelings to color and guide my perceptions. None can escape the comforting prison of subjectivity. In light of this, I'm uncertain of how best to stay afloat in a sea of multiplicity.

My dilemma, in a nutshell

nutshell

A Different Brand of Dream

I've been wondering when the dream would come again. When would I slip into another me's mind? I had a mad dream last night that didn't feature any quantum relocation of consciousness. I went back to my old prior school for some unknown reason. Walking through the halls I noticed many varieties of teenage cliques lounging about. Of course, I knew none of them and they knew not me. As I continued to walk down the halls my discomfort at being a stranger grew. I left the building and walked outside. Bathed in loneliness, I looked all around for something familiar. This is not my memory. Then I knew why the discomfort. My family, Vale, my friends. Those are the people I know and should be concerned about. All these people I don't know, they may forever stay that way. But if I can't maintain decent relationships with those currently in my life what hope do I have to maintain a relationship with anyone ever?

Reaching One of Many

Tell me why I'm here?

Where else would you be?

I wake up, my jaw hurts.

Stop bruxing.

Then, who are you?

You, not you. Socially and psychologically, we're two different entities. But, Mark, in a quantum fashion - we're the same; two instantiations of an infinitely mutable personatype. We're losing our selves, Mark. We're fragmenting by coalescing.

But what'll happen to us?

We'll become whole.

The Rest of It, For What It's Worth.

I've figured it out. A brief conversation with him/me. Whether he remembers...I'll have to wait and see. You got a fragment because the wire was on. You got the middle. The beginning and the end:

I woke up and got ready for work. Slipped on my shoes, warmed some water for a bowl of nutri-paste, linked up for news (the war is "over"). I felt him then while I stood in the kitchen watching the water boil. A slightly curious, highly confused, and more than typically anxious presence tickled my head. No words, just a brief awareness on my part. It made sense. I just woke up. And here is one of them/me. Cultivate your awareness. Entice him/me.

I ate. He/I expressed disgust at the paste's flavor. It's all you need, I said to the inside. That, and this. Then I ate the bowl.

I guess the world outside amazed him/me to the point of articulation. That day it took me 45 minutes to get out of my subdivision. He/I asked what the hell this was. The Sprawl, I said. The Suburbs. Then I looked in my rearview mirror. He/I gasped. I understood. What's your name? Mark. Karm. The conversation posted a few days ago took place. I arrived at work. Mark grew anxious then vaporous. He/I must have woken. Risen from a nightmare of the Sprawl. Back to reality. You/I'll be back, Mark. If not, I'll see you/me tonight.

The Telvolution Will Be Revelised

I’ve been exercising as much as my health permits. I’ve been trying to form articulate descriptions for those expressing concern. It comes out as gibberish, which does nothing to bring our positions into any type of concordance.
Does anyone out in the ether know the etymology of the word “gibberish”? Was there once a land called Gibber? And did their alphabet consist of all consonants? Did the Queen Mother of Gibber ride around in a purple pumpkin and did her husband wear a liquid crown? Could the people of Gibber understand each other?
I stand before a simulated monkey. He dances and chatters and bares his teeth. He eats, sleeps, shits, and sometimes flings that shit at passers-by. He watches those watching him watching them. He hasn’t yet realized this is the feedback loop of self-awareness. He knows he is on display. He doesn’t yet realize he is watching himself watch himself. But when he does – oh! – when he does...the world around him will crumble and rebuild itself exactly as before; only this time, the monkey will stand before a simulated world. He will then dance, chatter, and bare his teeth. He will eat, sleep, shit, and sometimes fling that shit at passers-by. He will watch those watching him watching them. He will realize that this is the feedback loop of self-awareness. He will then ask, “For whom am I on display?”

Spin to Win

The irregularity gets to me. We live in a universe that exhibits “handedness”, symmetry. On top of that, everything spins. We might doubt that the universe spins, but I don’t see why we should. Anyway, I think as the universe expands and speeds up and expands some more that centrifugal force distorts our symmetry.
Have you seen ever seen footage of what happens to a person in a centrifuge? They spin and spin and spin and their facial features get distorted from the G-force. Then, their eyes roll back into their heads and “Poof!” - they cold pass out. Some have an NDE (which is interesting when you come to realize that we all live out our lives in the biggest centrifuge all them all – do we all pass out and see a god when the motion gets too much?). But, more importantly, a centrifuge distorts humans. The faster they spin, the more out of whack become their appearances. There is probably an internal distortion as well but it’s harder to judge that from video.
In the wake of the universe’s centrifugal force, the male/female bond pulls apart at its seams. The relationship between humans and their non-manufactured environment elongates and stretches. The psyche itself twists and ripples as result. Distortion becomes the norm when movement precedes existence.

Carbonation

Perhaps it was the recent lunar eclipse, perhaps not.
Whatever IT was, something there was that did not love a relationship.
Many couples that once were are no more.
Some went in a bastardly flash.
Some went after torturous discussion, debate, debacle, and doubt.

I did dream last night. Not of anything important or dimension shattering. A simple dream about a visit to a small town and the downright awe such a visit can inspire in a person who’s never been to a small town. In the dream, I took two other people with me to a small town I used to live in. My guests (who I think were George Clooney and Tim Blake Nelson in their ‘O, Brother’ garb but I can’t really remember) wanted to touch everything and seemed to regard the entire environment as holy/sacred. I thought, that’s odd – that road is where I drank my first six pack and that road is where I lost my virginity.

I guess the old saying holds true:
"One person’s holy ground is another’s hotbed of adolescent debauchery."

My Brain Hurts

I want to have an adventure.
It doesn’t seem like it would be that hard of a thing to manage. Simply sever the I.V. drip called “salary” that connects me to my job and find an old galleon upon which to stow away. That’s not too much too ask.

I heard a news item today about scientists from one field who got caught imitating scientists from another field. This group of biologists decided they wanted to impersonate physicists, you know, just for kicks. The biologists’ names were Alex, Ted, George, and Chad. They worked for a university somewhere in the East. Anyway, they lost their biology garb and donned that of a physicist. Then, they sneaked into the physics lab at the university and got to work. They dropped bowling balls from the tops of towers and teleported light. Eventually though, the imposters got caught when they tried to lecture one afternoon. About halfway through the lecture one of the class’s quietest students stood up and yelled, “That’s not Planck’s constant!” The students were outraged and a riot ensued. The biologists barely escaped with their lives only to be caught an hour later by campus security. Some people will go to great lengths to entertain themselves.

What is the sound of one head missing?

There once was a man who woke to find his head missing. He could still see, hear, and think – this tale isn’t long enough to tell whether he could still taste. He woke and went to the bathroom and didn’t look in the mirror and sat on the toilet and when he tried to rest his head in his hands he almost fell forward and pissed all over himself. He stood up with his pants around his ankles and went to the mirror. He saw his headless body. He passed one hand through the space where his head had been. Then he passed the other hand through. He tried to spit. Nothing came out. He wondered how he could see. Then he wondered how he could breathe.

The phone rang.

He tried to answer it but the receiver didn’t fit anywhere. A disembodied voice sounded in the air like a helium-sucking ghost, “Hello? Hello? Dieter, are you there?”

He hung up the phone and began to ready himself for his first day as The Man Who Woke to Find His Head Missing.