III. The “EVERYTHING” TABLE


Based on the results of the GE 2008, I have created an table, which, once one learns to interpret the numbers, tells pretty much everything we need to know about the election. It is a comparative table of the GE Nov. 4, 2008 to the final poll convergence numbers (Diff. 1) and to the averages from the GE in 2004 (Diff. 2). The table is sorted according to winning margin, from Obama's largest down to his leanest, then from McCain's leanest to his largest.


I have also published the table via GOOGLE DOCS , and if you go to the link, you can re-sort the table according to other variables other than margin. This is what makes the table so useful.


NOTE: due to rounding from 1/1000th of a % to 1/100th of a %, there are examples where the margin % appears 0.01% off from the difference between Obama's % and McCain's %. I don't just subtract the losing percent from the winning percent. I take the real vote margin and divide it by the total votes to calculate the margin. So, the slight deviations you may see here and there are indeed CORRECT. For instance: DE, ME


State

EV

BO-%

JM-%

Margin

PC 12

Diff. 1

2004

Diff. 2

DC

3

92.46

06.53

85.93

69.00

+16.93

79.84

+6.09

HI

4

71.85

26.58

45.26

36.00

+9.26

8.74

+36.52

VT

3

67.46

30.45

37.01

27.00

+10.01

20.14

+16.87

RI

4

63.13

35.21

27.92

18.10

+9.82

20.75

+7.17

NY

31

62.80

36.11

26.69

29.00

-2.31

18.29

+8.41

MA

12

61.80

35.99

25.81

21.33

+4.48

25.16

+0.65

MD

10

61.92

36.47

25.44

17.30

+8.14

12.98

+12.46

IL

21

61.92

36.78

25.13

24.90

+0.23

10.34

+14.81

DE

3

61.94

36.95

25.00

20.70

+4.30

7.59

+17.40

CA

55

60.95

36.92

24.03

24.00

+0.03

9.95

+14.08

CT

7

60.59

38.22

22.37

21.33

+1.04

10.37

+12.00

ME

4

57.71

40.38

17.32

17.15

+0.17

9.00

+8.32

WA

11

57.43

40.32

17.11

14.60

+2.51

7.18

+9.93

MI

17

57.37

40.92

16.46

14.44

+2.02

3.42

+13.04

OR

7

56.75

40.40

16.35

15.57

+0.78

4.16

+12.19

NM

5

56.91

41.78

15.13

9.26

+5.87

0.79

+15.92

NJ

15

57.15

41.62

15.54

16.00

-0.46

6.68

+8.85

WI

10

56.22

42.31

13.90

11.34

+2.56

0.38

+13.52

NV

5

55.15

42.65

12.49

6.83

+5.66

2.59

+15.09

MN

10

54.06

43.82

10.24

12.00

-1.76

3.48

+6.76

PA

21

54.48

44.17

10.32

7.30

+3.02

2.50

+7.82

NH

4

54.13

44.52

9.61

10.43

-0.82

1.37

+8.24

IA

7

53.93

44.39

9.53

12.75

-3.22

0.67

+10.20

CO

9

53.66

44.71

8.95

6.62

+2.33

4.67

+13.62

USA

--

52.87

45.62

7.25

7.54

-0.29

2.46

+9.71

VA

13

52.63

46.33

6.30

4.93

+1.37

8.20

+14.50

OH

20

51.38

46.80

4.58

2.30

+2.28

2.11

+6.69

FL

27

50.91

48.10

2.81

1.79

+1.02

5.01

+7.82

NE-02*

1*

49.97

48.75

1.21

4.00

+5.21

21.79

+23.00

IN

11

49.91

48.88

1.03

1.18

+2.21

20.68

+21.71

NC

15

49.70

49.38

0.33

0.62

-0.29

12.43

+12.76

--

--

 

 

 

 

--

--

--

St.

EV

BO-%

JM-%

Margin

PC 12

Diff. 1

2004

Diff. 2

MO

11

49.25

49.39

0.13

0.46

-0.33

7.20

-7.06

MT

3

47.17

49.43

2.26

1.64

+0.62

20.50

-18.24

GA

15

46.90

52.10

5.20

3.85

+1.35

16.60

-11.40

SD

3

44.75

53.16

8.41

7.50

+0.91

21.47

-13.06

AZ

10

44.91

53.39

8.48

4.43

+4.05

10.47

-1.99

ND

3

44.47

53.07

8.60

1.34

+9.94

27.36

-18.76

SC

8

44.90

53.87

8.98

12.55

-3.57

17.08

-8.10

TX

34

43.64

55.39

11.76

13.00

-1.24

22.86

-11.11

WV

5

42.55

55.69

13.14

7.66

+5.48

12.86

+0.28

MS

6

43.00

56.18

13.17

10.50

+2.67

19.69

-6.51

TN

11

41.83

56.90

15.07

14.00

+1.07

14.27

+0.79

KS

6

41.57

56.50

14.93

17.00

-2.07

25.38

-10.45

NE*

4*

41.60

56.53

14.93

19.00

-4.07

33.22

-18.28

KY

8

41.15

57.37

16.22

12.40

+3.82

19.86

-3.64

LA

9

39.93

58.56

18.63

10.43

+8.20

14.51

+4.12

AR

6

38.86

58.72

19.85

10.75

+9.10

9.76

+10.09

AL

9

38.74

60.32

21.58

19.33

+2.25

25.62

-4.04

AK

3

37.89

59.42

21.54

14.58

+6.96

25.55

-4.01

ID

4

35.96

61.30

25.34

23.00

+2.34

38.12

-12.78

UT

5

34.27

62.34

28.07

24.00

+4.07

45.54

-17.47

OK

7

34.35

65.65

31.29

30.15

+1.14

31.14

+0.15

WY

3

32.54

64.78

32.24

23.00

+9.24

39.79

-7.55


The EVERYTHING Table in this configuration is automatically the partisan ranking of all 51 „states“ as of 2008, based on each states performance in the GE. This means that the state at the top of the list is the most liberal state in the union, whereas state state at the bottom of the list is the least liberal. Reading the states in reverse order would give the conservative partisan rankings from most to least. For instance: DC is the 1st most liberal „state“ in the Union and the 51st most conservative „state“. WY is the 1st most conservative „state“ in the Union and the 51st most liberal „state“.


Here a table comparing the margin spreads (numerically):


Margin

BO

EV

JM

EV

+30 and up

3

10

2

10

+20 to +30

8

143

4

21

+10 to +20

10

105

9

89**

+5 to +10

4

33

5

39

+2 to +5

2

47

1

3

+1 to +2

1

11

--

--

Subtotal

 

349

 

162

Under +1

1**

16**

1

11

TOTAL

 

365

 

173


**Figure adjusted for the elector-splitting in NE.

This table depicts that Obama had a landslide base of 259 EV going into and on election day. McCain had a landslide base of 120 EV going into and on election day.


The last democratic candidate to win 11 states or more with blowout margins of 20% or more? LBJ, in 1964.