Fjölmiðlar og fámiðlar: Tenglasafn

Most popular time-shifted TV shows - Lost Remote TV Blog
Top 10 “Timeshifted” Primetime TV Programs - 2006

Google service for advertisers to view viewers may come to UK | Media | The Guardian
The Google TV Ads service takes information from set-top boxes to calculate how many people are watching which ads. The platform is built on Google's successful AdWords service, which allows advertisers to "purchase" keywords which, when searched for by Google users, will also bring up that advertiser's advert.

Listen now, pay never | Technology | The Guardian

With CD sales plummeting and digital failing to make up for losses, Owen Gibson looks at the concept of 'free' — anathema to record labels, but a rallying cry to others

Apple sets out strategy to dominate mobile market | Technology | guardian.co.uk
As the mobile phone industry struggles to come to grips with Apple's iPhone, the biggest mistake it could make is to see the device purely as a phone. If this wasn't obvious before, it became crystal clear on 6 March, when Steve Jobs and some of his colleagues unveiled their plans for what they called 'iPhone 2.0'.

Google snaps at ITV1's heels for UK ad income crown | Media | guardian.co.uk

Google may have to wait another year to overtake ITV1 as the UK's biggest single advertising income generator, despite announcing UK revenues of $2.53bn (£1.3bn) for 2007.

 

Jeff Jarvis: Television is dead. Long live the new television | Media | The Guardian
All the old definitions of TV are in shambles. Television need not be broadcast. It needn't be produced by studios and networks. It no longer depends on big numbers and blockbusters. It doesn't have to fit 30- and 60-minute moulds. It isn't scheduled. It isn't mass. The limits of television - of distribution, of tools, of economics, of scarcity - are gone. So now, at last, we can ask not what TV is, but what it can be.

Comment is free: An offer Yahoo couldn't refuse
Today, we know all about Yahoo's problems. Glibly summed up, we can say it does some lovely, gorgeous things, but struggles to tie them all together into a sensible proposition - both for its vast audience, and for its advertisers. It's often hard to find good stuff on their sites - even when you've seen it once before. And it really should be making more money. Microsoft, meanwhile, makes bags of cash - but mostly from its legacy operating system monopoly. It's struggled in the new media world, and you could argue it has some bigger strategic concerns than its prey. What's the future for a desktop operating system company, in a networked world?

Comment is free: Big won't win
Yahoo, I've long argued, is the last old media company, for it operates on the old-media model: it owns or controls content, markets to bring audience in, then bombards us with ads until we leave.