Content

Not great (ugh!)

Really Like it

Amazing and Hot

Trainer agenda
Workshop goals, outcomes, activities, blueprint - Taylor, Melissa, Anthony, & Deb

• Goals and outcomes are not stated or minimally stated
  
• Activities don't match goals and outcomes
• Scheduling and pacing of activities is inappropriate for timeframe / audience
• No action steps are given for presenters
  

• Goals and outcomes are stated but are vague
• Some activities match goals and outcomes
• Scheduling and pacing of activities is mostly appropriate
• Action steps are given but lack detail
  

• Clearly stated goals and outcomes
• All activities match goals and outcomes
  

• Scheduling and pacing are appropriate for all activities
  
• Includes clear and descriptive action steps are given for each presenter

Participant agenda - Taylor, Melissa, Anthony, & Deb

• Poorly stated or lacking goals and outcomes
• Document is inconcise and/or wordy
• Document is lacking in professional appearance (e.g., inappropriate font, formatting, etc)
  
• contains numerous spelling and/or grammatical errors
  

• Goals and outcomes are stated but vague
• Document is concise but contains some irrelevant information
• Document is somewhat professional in appearance (e.g., appropriate font, formatting, etc), but contains some unprofessional elements
  
• contains a few spelling and/or grammatical errors

• Clearly stated goals and outcomes
• Document is concise and contains only relevant information
  
• Document is professional in appearance (e.g., appropriate font, formatting, etc)

• free of spelling and/or grammatical errors
  

Google Site with workshop support materials (Genna & Kathleen) - Carmen

• too few examples for the teacher
• lack of categories clearly defined
• dull colors
• not enough materials that explain how to do it
• grammar errors

• navigation is clear and organized, relevant
• support materials have at  different ways with steps for the learner print and an example made the tool. (video, text, camtasia, links, and examples)
  
• easy to find what you want
  
• simplified for the audience it is trying to reach
  
• purposely colorful
• good use of icons

• navigation is innovative organized and large amounts of relevant info is chunked
• support materials are professional looking and clearly engage the learner, make the best use of the tool being featured, and have examples linked to the workshop
•  continuous color and theme throughout the site
• materials cutting edge
• thoughtful display of resources
• links that take you beyond what you expected
• inspiring and dynamic and invites the viewer in.

Presenter(s)

Interaction with audience

(Tammy, Erica, Rob) -Corrie-would like to do this?

Audience checking email, having conversations, snoring.  Walking out of workshop, not taking handouts.

On-topic questions.  Smiles.  Applause.  Nods or other gestures of agreement/approval.  Leaving feedback.

Laughter at appropriate points, standing ovation. Signing up for future workshops.

video to support the workshop (Julie, Erica, Brian, Miles)

Non-existent; too long or too short; unengaging; not accessible on multiple platforms or file size too big to make it accessible; too many transitions/styles/fonts (no consistency), difficult to see or hear; pixelated; blurry; bad composition or audio; too much text or not enough in the screen shot

Poor editing but the lesson is there; too many transitions or transitions are slightly unclear; pace of video doesn't match the timing of the lesson; inaccessible terms & language; background music isn't distracting

About a minute--short, sweet, to the point, easy & clear connection, sets realistic expectations, accessible language & images, no seizure-inducing transitions, small file size; provides context or presents background-building; gets you excited and motivated

Team work and collaboration

Diane and Karen

Some evidence of teamwork:

Only two of the following were present:

•Meeting agendas

•Emails

•Timeline with responsibilities

•Collaboration on the ning

Few pauses in the final presentation

Evidence of teamwork:

•Meeting agendas

•Emails

•Timeline with responsibilities

•Collaboration on the ning

Seamless final presentation