MEMORANDUM


TO: Town of Sharon Board of Selectmen

FROM: Sharon Energy Advisory Committee

RE: Energy Efficiency Improvements to Town Municipal Buildings

DATE: October 31, 2008


As part of our efforts to assist the Town in reducing the Town’s energy consumption and costs, the Energy Advisory Committee has commissioned energy audits of Town municipal buildings. Audits of building gas consumption were performed by RISE Engineering, which is a contractor to Bay State Gas under its Partners in Energy Program. Audits of building electricity consumption for lighting were conducted by Northern Energy Services, which is a contractor to NStar under its Business Solutions Program. Some of the audits have been completed and the results presented to the Committee. Other audits are still in the process of being performed.


The following table summarizes the results of the audits, including the recommended measures, total cost, rebates under the identified programs, net cost to the Town, and annual savings. Details for each cost can be found in the individual audits reports.1 We have also included our working estimates of the cost of other upgrades we anticipate will be recommended in forthcoming audits. These estimates are marked in yellow (gray if printed).


Building

Upgrade Light Fixtures

Replace HVAC & Controls

Light Rebate

Boiler Rebate

Net Cost After Rebates

Annual Savings

Police Dept

$7,918

$24,000

$1,605

$4,000

$26,313

$5,377

Civil Defense

0 2

$29,670

$0

$13,585

$16,085

 $5,190

Fire Station

$7,470

$35,000

$1,360

$7,000

$34,110

$5,259

Town Hall

$13,898

$40,000

$4,060

$7,000

$42,838

$2,789

Water Division

$5,000

$30,000

$1,000

$5,000

$29,000

 

Community Center

03

03

$0

$0

$0

$0

Library

03

$40,000

$0

$7,000

$33,000

 

DPW

$15,121

03

$3,595

0

$11,526

$2,375

Horizons For Youth

$10,000

$40,000

$2,500

$7,000

$40,500

 

Totals

$59,407

$238,670

$14,120

$50,585

$233,372

$20,990


Total expected cost to the town for these upgrades (upgraded light fixtures and replaced HVAC and controls taken together) is $298,077 with a total rebate of $64,705 for a final cost of $233,372.


In the course of our investigation of the energy use of our buildings, we have discovered that the HVAC system in the new Community Center is using more energy than expected. The system is likely not properly balanced, and there may have been some inadequacies with installation. To remedy this situation, we recommend a complete commissioning study be conducted on the system. A commissioning agent would establish the design intent of the system and would conduct intensive testing of the equipment to make sure it was properly installed, is functioning as designed, is properly balanced and calibrated, that the controls are working properly and is being operated correctly. Based upon quotes received on other projects by members of our committee, we estimate that the cost of commissioning would be between $1 and $1.50 per square foot. At 28,000 square feet, we estimate the cost at between $28,000 and $42,000.


The Committee believes it is necessary for the Town to budget funds to begin to implement the efficiency measures listed in the chart above as part of its goal to reduce Town energy consumption by 10 percent. To this end, the Committee recommends that the Selectmen (a) set aside allowances for the identified capital outlays in the upcoming process for approval of Town capital expenditures; and (b) direct Town staff to proceed with the next steps in the implementation of the recommended measures.


Supplemental Fire Station Walk Through


A supplemental walk through of the Fire Station by George Aronson and Ed Connelly in September 2008 revealed several building envelope and control issues that should be addressed in order to achieve further energy savings. The roof is currently under-insulated; we estimate that R-10 insulation was added when the roof was replaced in the early 1990’s. The walls of the building have minimal insulation. The windows that were replaced in the early 1990’s are leaky; there are still other single pane windows in the heated garage bays. The old tower that was designed for hose drying appears to act as a chimney, sucking heat from the main garage bay. There are no controls to turn off the heating system when the garage doors are opened, and the system does not have a remote control to allow the doors to be closed from an exiting truck. There is a significant amount of electric baseboard heat in the interior office and crew areas.


Recommendations:


We have not developed cost estimates for these improvements.