Response Blog Rubric
Criterion |
Poor 0-1 |
Novice 2 |
Proficient 3 |
Outstanding 4 |
|
Focus and Content |
Lacks development, focus, no connections are made |
Some focus is present. 1 or more ideas are presented. |
Writing is focused. 2 or more ideas from your experiences and/or research are well developed |
Topic is focused and fully developed with several specific examples from your experiences and/or research. Student makes connections to his/her own original thought. |
|
Organization |
Not clear |
Some indication of meaning |
Clearly written with main ideas present |
Coherent and well organized; main ideas are easy to distinguish. |
|
Uses the conventions of language that meet academic writing standards |
Inaccurate spelling & grammar |
Adequate grasp of language conventions |
Writes in paragraphs and accurate language conventions |
Accuracy in conventions and command of stylistic aspects of language |
|
Creativity |
No creative elements are present |
1 creative element is present |
At least 2 creative elements are present |
Creative presentation of topic: added pictures; use of links to other Web elements such as websites, blogs, podcasts, readings, etc. At least 3 creative elements are present. |
Rubric for Responding to Your Peers’ Blogs
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Response to Other Blogs |
Does not respond to other blog/response does not extend original post. |
Fewer than 3 comments posted. Comments are loosely related or unrelated to your peers’ postings. |
Between 3 and 5 comments posted. Comments are related to original post but do not extend the thoughts of your peer(s). |
More than 5 comments posted. Comments demonstrate that you have read a peer’s posting by reacting to or asking about the post. Your comments are meaningful and extend the original post with your own ideas (in a respectful way related to the course content). |