I would like your indulgence on this little diddy that I will address
today. This item I'd never heard of prior to our 2008 mail count and
yet it has permeated the entire Postal Service like fletters. This is
and has become very distasteful and as far as I'm concerned derogatory
to both employees and management alike. It must have originated from
some dark corner of the Headquarters in DC because of the rapid
acceptance of it , and all that come in contact with it has become
acceptable. This is of course,
" IT IS WHAT IT IS"
I believe that this saying was THE SPAWN OF DEMONS or ( some misguided QWL-EI
team attempting to justify the rape, burning and pillaging of the
evaluated system used by the Rural Letter Carriers to determine
their fate).
I can't honestly say which but
either is the most vile of creatures that I can now think of, as in my
opinion this metaphor comes to symbolize the 2008 mail count and all
that has been freely given away by our Association, or taken by the
USPS when dealing with our time standards and the idea of " a fair days
pay for a fair days work".
I know that there are those of you
that may believe that our method of pay is the most effective and
proficient system of compensation and after 26 years in this system, I
certainly know of the benefits.
Yet I can't help but wonder why, we as a craft are so fearful at even looking at alternative ways of compensation?
I pose this idea as we are rapidly approaching our NATIONAL CONVENTION and
we will most assuredly be approached by one side of this issue or
another. The arguments for evaluated are many and to be honest with you
I prefer this method of compensation, as the many benefits of that
system including but not limited to, RCAs for every route (oops that's
a misrepresentation) day's off at our leisure (oops that's a
misrepresentation) ability to go home when we've finished our job
(that's a reality) are a blessing indeed, and yet an hourly system
would assure a 8 hour day and 2 day's off a week.
Yes the
argument of management following us around like little children would
get in the way, especially those of us that would want to do our jobs
and go home, but is it so vile that we even refuse to look at this as a
viable option? Are we so blind as to believe that the evaluated system
is the only way?
I think back to our forefathers and their
efforts to create this system when they grappled with the
implementation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in May of 1974
and subsequent legislation, and wonder if then it was their intent to
see our time standards diminish by ( hook or crook ) our employer and
our association to the point where we appreciate losses and no gains in
time standards. Certainly we are not so smug, as to not think about
those that follow as those that came before did?
Are we so involved with our own self interests that we have come to accept a vile issuance like " It is what it is " without
even so much as a question of it's intent? We are being led down a path
of destruction by our own actions by not even considering the viability
of a alternative method of pay. We cannot be afforded the luxury
anymore of not investigating all options available, if not for those of
us that have a few years left, but for those that have only begun a
career. Our actions or lack thereof in this National Convention will
have implications that will affect this craft for decades to come. I
understand that I can be overzealous in issues like my future, and I
will not apologize for same, yet we have got to make the tough choices
today for negotiations in 2010 will be here before we know it, and can
we afford to not be prepared?
And Thats The Way Jay Sees It