Why the Bicycle?
Fact Sheet provided by the Atlanta area bicycle advocacy organization, the Atlanta Bicycle Campaign
Bicycles provides a simple answer that addresses many persistent questions in American life today: the epidemic of chronic diseases such as asthma and obesity, the congestion that threatens to strangle our cities and commutes, the poor air quality that harms public health and reduces quality of life, the lack of outdoor activity and exercise among both children and adults, the need for local economic development and fiscal relief in difficult financial times.
2. Bicycling is a healthier transportation option
3. Cities that increase their proportion of bike commuters experience congestion reductions
4. Becoming a bicycle-friendly community results in:
5. Bicycling saves on gas
|
|
Daily |
Weekly |
Monthly |
Yearly |
|
$ Gas Savings (10 mile daily commute, 22 mpg, $3.50/gallon) |
$1.59 |
$7.95 |
$31.82 |
$413.64 |
6. Bicycling saves on carbon emissions
|
|
Daily |
Weekly |
Monthly |
Yearly |
|
Pounds of CO2 NOT added to the atmosphere (10 mile daily commute, 22 mpg, $3.50 mpg) |
9 |
45 |
180 |
2,340 |
Source: http://www.bikecommuters.com/gas-saving-calculator
Note: The average American drives 12,000 miles per year, which in a 2006 model car emits approximately 11,000 pounds of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere annually, equal to the amount stored in 128 tree seedlings grown for 10 years (from Driving Green).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created air pollution standards for pollutants that come from transportation sources - ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter. Motor vehicles also give off what are called "precursors" such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), sulfur oxides (SOx), and ammonia (NH3) that contribute to air pollution. While urban air quality has improved greatly, transportation remains a major source of air pollution. Road transportation comprises 27 percent of VOC emissions, 35 percent of NOx emissions, and 55 percent of CO emissions. (from National Emissions Inventory Air Pollutant Emissions Trends Data, 2002)
A reduction in cycling may lead to an increased risk for the cyclists remaining on the road, due to a "safety in numbers" effect documented by several researchers (Jacobsen PL. Injury Prevention 2003)
The probability of an individual cyclist being struck by a motorist declines with the 0.6 power of the number of cyclists on the road. That means that if the number of cyclists on the road doubles, then the average individual cyclist can ride for an additional 50 % of the time without increasing his probability of being struck. It is thought that the increased frequency of motorist-cyclist interaction creates more aware motorists. (M. Wardlaw (December 2002). "Assessing the actual risks faced by cyclists". Traffic Engineering & Control 43: 352–356.)