TO: STAFF
FROM: GREGG
DATE: 12.16.07
RE: REPORT ON HIGH/LOW PERFORMING SCHOOLS IN MAINE
Linked
is another 2007 report from the University of Southern Maine; this one
on high and low performing schools in Maine. It's really interesting if
you have the time to read it. I'm going to make eight points, here,
that could be perceived as blaming or damning and in that sense
controversial, but please don't read them that way. These are straights
facts that can be gleaned by anyone reading this report. Beyond that,
the personal opinion I've added in is labeled as such and is about why
we are where we're at in this report, and in some sense that involves
comparison, but I'm concerned with us not anyone else. If someone reads
it otherwise, so be it, but my intent is to face hard facts so we can
keep up our work, and facing hard facts will always be seen as a
controversy, I suppose, and if that happens then it's controversy I can
live with.
1.
Out of the 118 high schools in the state of Maine, 14 are considered
high performing according to the six criteria outlined in the report
(and they are excellent criteria, as far as I'm concerned), and 24 are
considered low performing. That leaves 80 schools somewhere in the
middle, all trying to make up their minds on which way they're going to
go.
2.
If a school resides in Waldo County (and this is any K - 12 school)
then the chances that it will be on the list of low performing schools
skyrockets, though it is not true, in the report overall, that all high performing
schools are from southern Maine. This conclusion is not elucidated in
the report, though the lists and statistics clearly bear it out. And
for the reason I put in #3 of this list, no one can say that this is because of economic disadvantage.
3.
My favorite criteria to determine either high or low performing schools
is that the USM researchers factored in school and community profile
data (level of parent and community education; economic factors,
etc.) and predicted scores on the MEA and/or the SAT then saw if the
school met those predictions, exceeded them, or scored lower than
expected. In this way, a school would not be
seen as high performing if the students all came from an affluent
community where most adults held college degrees, but the students
scored well BUT lower than expected on the SAT, for instance.
So, where Waldo county has a lower than average educational level for
adults and a lower than average socioeconomic base, predictions on
standardized tests would be lower, and those schools would have to perform even lower than those projections to be seen as low performing.
Having
said that, there are 27 public schools in Waldo County, according to my
own count -- and discounting WCTC and Isleboro (whose student numbers
are, I believe, too low for the report to consider).
Fourteen are considered low performing. Waldo County is the only county
-- again, according to my calculations -- that has over 50% of its
schools listed as low performing.
Let's
consider that number for a moment before going on. How or why is it
that so many Waldo County schools score below predictions, even when
those predictions factor in the tough climate for educational
success? Here are my few theories on this. First, remember that in the
MYDAUS report, Waldo County is consistently the ONLY county in Maine
where both adult and student data indicate that
we are first or second in every negative, anti-social and substance
abuse category and last or second to last in every pro-social category.
This indicates there are more factors than just economics and
educational level working against the academic success of public school
students. However, what I personally believe is the biggest factor is a
psychological one. I believe that if you check, almost none
of the low performing schools have, for instance, an intervention
system. Why would that be? If the tests tell these schools year after
year that students are underperforming, why no
interventions? What if, due to all the significant factors going
against these Waldo County schools and the kids who attend there that
slowly, over time, a sense of learned helplessness sets in? What if the unspoken logic goes like this: why keep kids in extended day or during the day interventions when so much is going against us all? If some version of that were true, then schools would fall below their predicted levels of success in a downward spiral.
4.
One Waldo County school -- Palermo Consolidated School -- was high
performing. Congratulations to them. I'm going for a visit. I don't
care what the grade level, I want to see a high performing school in action and learn from them.
5. Twelve Waldo County schools are not listed in the report, meaning that they are in-between high and low performing.
6.
In Waldo County, that underperformed compared to all other counties,
was there one school district that could be said to have especially
underperformed? Yes. And yes, it was MSAD 56. Of the five
schools in MSAD 56 (three elementary, one middle, one high school),
four of them were on the low performing schools lists. That's 80% of
schools at low performance levels.
7. Of the three high schools in Waldo County, two were considered low performing in the report.
8. Searsport District High School is not in the report, and thus falls in between low and high performing.
Why, and is it cause for celebration or not?
Interventions
(including skill-based and effort-based interventions); a move to
increase rigor on Bloom's, based on our recent Great Maine Schools end
of year visit in 2006, connected with getting kids
into the classroom and out of the halls, both of which were confirmed
as being very successful efforts by the GMSPs return visit in 2007;
reorganizing lesson plans based on departmental analysis
of standards; a new awareness of cross-curricular skills (after
completing common rubrics); an increase in AP and college courses in
the past two years.
Combine
this with information you're getting this week on PSAT results where
sophomores, in the standards-based system, outperformed and/or equaled
juniors, in the traditional system, on several categories indicating that the results from the report linked in this email are on an improvement curve for us.
Said
another way, though we're still early on in all those and other
efforts, we are not caught in the downward spiral of feeling like
educational conditions are tough and so not seeing or believing, on a
deep level, that we can do anything about it. Instead we're waging a
considerable battle against those conditions and believe we can beat
them back and thus turn around our students' futures.
I
think it's officially cause to press forward and make our efforts
permanent parts of the SDHS culture as we keep up the drumbeat of this
work to improve every student's chances to have real options upon graduation.
We
will, given a few years to work out what we've started, be a high
performing school. I know that this is true as surely as I know I'm
sitting here typing these words. I think we should celebrate. We're moving. It's working.
http://usm.maine.edu/cepare/Reports/IdentifyingHigher.pdf