Matthew 5 : 33 - 37


Verse

Paraphrase

Questions, Answers, Observations

Cross Reference

Insights

Personal Applications

33. ‘Again, you have heard how it was said to our ancestors, You must not break your oath, but must fulfil your oaths to the Lord.

NLT version:

Again, you have heard that the law of Moses says, ‘Do not break your vows; you must carry out the vows you have made to the Lord.’

What you have promised to the Lord, give it to the Lord with all your heart

Q&A

1. Who is our ancestor?

The israelites


2. What occasion was the law said?

It’s in Nb 30:3. Moses told the tribal leaders of israel


3. What was said exactly?

See Nb 30:3


Observations

* God remembers. He is strict, uses strong words like ‘must’


Ex 20:7

God is strict.

Nb 30:3

This is when the law was said

Dt 23:22

Jm 5:12

Two examples when the law was referenced


CCC 592

CCC 2463



34. But I say this to you, do not swear at all, either by heaven, since that is God’s throne;

NLT version:

But I say, don’t make any vows! If you say, ‘By heaven!’ it is a sacred vow because heaven is God’s throne.

Don’t swear!

Heaven is God’s throne.

Q&A

1. Why do people swear?

See link

2. What does God’s throne means?


Observations

* Heaven is God’s throne.

* Heaven is sacred.


CCC 581

CCC 2141

CCC 2153



35. or by earth, since that is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, since that is the city of the great King.

NLT version:

And if you say, ‘By the earth!’ it is a sacred vow because the earth is his footstool.

Earth is God’s footstool.

Jerusalem is the city of the great King.

Q&A

1. Does the great King means Jesus?

2. What does his footstool means?

Jesus brings any thing that people might swear with to God.

3. Do people swear at these times?

Yes. Stated in Mat 23:16


Observations

* Earth is sacred


Ps 48:2

Ref for city of the great King


Footnote Ps 48:2



36. Do not swear by your own head either, since you cannot turn a single hair white or black.

NLT version:

Don’t even swear, ‘By my head!’ for you can’t turn one hair white or black.

Don’t swear on your own body or life or you. You don’t have power over your self.

Q&A

1. How do we usually say when we swear by our own head?

2. Does hair means anything here?


Observations

* Uses hair and head.





37. All you need say is “Yes” if you mean yes, “No” if you mean no; anything more than this comes from the Evil One.

NLT version:

Just say a simple, ‘Yes, I will,’ or ‘No, I won’t.’ Your word is enough. To strengthen your promise with a vow shows that something is wrong.

Say what you mean, mean what you say. Be truthful from your heart. Swearing shows something is wrong.

Q&A

1. What if we give excuses?

It is considered the ‘unnecessary extra’

2. Does ‘comes from the Evil One’ means sin?

Yes

3. How to be strong against the Evil One?

Be closer to Jesus

4. What’s the practical tips to keeping our words?

See personal application


Observations

* Your word is enough. When we promise, put it into words, not only in heart.


2 Co 1:17-19

St Paul said Jesus is all Yes

Jm 5:12


Footnote v37


CCC 2153

CCC 2338

CCC 2466


Imitation of Christ, Book 1, Chapter 10

* We should give our promise with sincerity.

* Sincerity comes in simplicity.

* Possible cause people swear can be because of sense of inferiority or fear.

* It may also be caused by pride.

* God knows our heart. So he knows if something is wrong.

* Do a reflection on the words that I have promised to God but did not keep it

* Reconcile with God by going to Sacrament of reconciliation

* Pray and ask for strength and good hope to love holiness in everything in life, starting from the smallest most ordinary thing.



REFERENCE


Exodus 20:7 > ‘You shall not misuse the name of Yahweh your God, for Yahweh will not leave unpunished anyone who misuses his name.


Numbers 30:3 > “If a man makes a vow to Yahweh or a formal pledge under oath, he must not break his word: whatever he promises by word of mouth he must do.


Deuteronomy 23:22 > ‘If you make a vow to Yahweh your God, you must not be slack about fulfilling it: Yahweh your God will certainly hold you answerable for it and you will incur guilt.


James 5:12 > Above all, my brothers, do not swear by heaven or by the earth or use any oaths at all. If you mean ‘yes’ you must say ‘yes’; if you mean ‘no’, say ‘no’. Otherwise you make yourselves liable to judgement.


Psalm 48:2 > Mount Zion in the heart of the north, the settlement of the great king;


2 Corinthians 1:17-19 > Since that was my purpose, do you think I lightly changed my mind? Or that my plans are based on ordinary human promptings and I have in my mind Yes, yes at the same time as No, no? As surely as God is trustworthy, what we say to you is not both Yes and No. The Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was proclaimed to you by us, that is by me and by Silvanus and Timothy, was never Yes-and-No; his nature is all Yes.


Mat 23:16-17 > ‘Alas for you, blind guides! You say, “If anyone swears by the Temple, it has no force; but anyone who swears by the gold of the Temple is bound.” Fools and blind! For which is of greater value, the gold or the Temple that makes the gold sacred? (up to verse 22)


FOOTNOTE


Psalm 48:2

In canaanite poetry ‘the mountain of the north’ is the home of the gods; the psalmist adopts the expression, applying it to Mount Zion.


Matthew 5:37

This seemingly well-known fomula. See 2 Co 1:17; Jm 5:12, can be understood in various ways:

  1. Truthfulness: if something is the case, say it is; if it is not, say it is not.

  2. Sincerity: let yes (or no) on the lips correspond to yes (or no) in the heart.

  3. Solemnity: the repetition of ‘yes’ or ‘no’ as a solemn affirmation or negation so strong that is avoids an oath which invokes the divinity.


Catechism of The Catholic Church (CCC)


CCC 592

Jesus did not abolish the Law of Sinai, but rather fulfilled it (cf. Mt 5:17-19) with such perfection (cf. Jn 8:46) that he revealed its ultimate meaning (cf.: Mt 5:33) and redeemed the transgressions against it (cf. Heb 9:15).


CCC 2463

How can we not recognize Lazarus, the hungry beggar in the parable (cf. Lk 17:19-31), in the multitude of human beings without bread, a roof or a place to stay? How can we fail to hear Jesus: "As you did it not to one of the least of these, you did it not to me" (Mt 25:45)?


CCC 581

The Jewish people and their spiritual leaders viewed Jesus as a rabbi. He often argued within the framework of rabbinical interpretation of the Law. Yet Jesus could not help but offend the teachers of the Law, for he was not content to propose his interpretation alongside theirs but taught the people "as one who had authority, and not as their scribes". In Jesus, the same Word of God that had resounded on Mount Sinai to give the written Law to Moses, made itself heard anew on the Mount of the Beatitudes. Jesus did not abolish the Law but fulfilled it by giving its ultimate interpretation in a divine way: "You have heard that it was said to the men of old. . . But I say to you. . ." With this same divine authority, he disavowed certain human traditions of the Pharisees that were "making void the word of God".


CCC 2141

The veneration of sacred images is based on the mystery of the Incarnation of the Word of God. It is not contrary to the first commandment.


CCC 2153

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus explained the second commandment: "You have heard that it was said to the men of old, 'You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.' But I say to you, Do not swear at all. . . . Let what you say be simply 'Yes' or 'No'; anything more than this comes from the evil one." Jesus teaches that every oath involves a reference to God and that God's presence and his truth must be honored in all speech. Discretion in calling upon God is allied with a respectful awareness of his presence, which all our assertions either witness to or mock.


CCC 2338

The chaste person maintains the integrity of the powers of life and love placed in him. This integrity ensures the unity of the person; it is opposed to any behavior that would impair it. It tolerates neither a double life nor duplicity in speech.


CCC 2466

In Jesus Christ, the whole of God's truth has been made manifest. "Full of grace and truth," he came as the "light of the world," he is the Truth. "Whoever believes in me may not remain in darkness." The disciple of Jesus continues in his word so as to know "the truth [that] will make you free" and that sanctifies. To follow Jesus is to live in "the Spirit of truth," whom the Father sends in his name and who leads "into all the truth." To his disciples Jesus teaches the unconditional love of truth: "Let what you say be simply 'Yes or No.'"


Others


Imitation of Christ, Book 1, Chapter 10

“… Bad habit and the neglect of our spiritual advancement contribute much to our keeping so little guard upon our tongue. But devout conferences, concerning spiritual things, help very much spiritual progress; especially where persons of the same goodmind and good spirit are associated together in God.”


Links


Chrysostom’s Homily

http://www.clerus.org/bibliaclerusonline/en/cl5.htm#dn

Next, to lead them farther away from swearing by God, He saith, “Neither by Heaven, for it is God’s throne, nor by the earth, for it is the footstool of His feet; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King:”29 still speaking out of the prophetical writings, and signifying Himself not to be opposed to the ancients. This was because they had a custom of swearing by these objects, and he intimates this custom near the end of his Gospel. (Mt 23:16)


Enchiridion 91

http://www.clerus.org/bibliaclerusonline/en/0q.htm#ew

Chapter 118.—The Four Stages of the Christain’s Life, and the Four Corresponding Stages of the Church’s History.

91 When, sunk in the darkest depths of ignorance, man lives according to the flesh undisturbed by any struggle of reason or conscience, this is his first state.

Afterwards, when through the law has come the knowledge of sin, and the Spirit of God has not yet interposed His aid, man, striving to live according to the law, is thwarted in his efforts and falls into conscious sin, and so, being overcome of sin, becomes its slave (“for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage”231 ); and thus the effect produced by the knowledge of the commandment is this, that sin worketh in man all manner of concupiscence, and he is involved in the additional guilt of willful transgression, and that is fulfilled which is written: “The, law entered that the Offense might abound.”232 This is man’s second state.

But if God has regard to him, and inspires him with faith in God’s help, and the Spirit of God begins to work in him, then the mightier power of love strives against the power of the flesh; and although there is still in the man’s own nature a power that fights against him (for his disease is not completely cured), yet he lives the life of the just by faith, and lives in righteousness so far as he does not yield to evil lust, but conquers it by the love of holiness. This is the third state of a man of good hope;

and he who by steadfast piety advances in this course, shall attain at last to peace, that peace which, after this life is over, shall be perfected in the repose of the spirit, and finally in the resurrection of the body.

Of these four different stages the first is before the law, the second is under the law, the third is under grace, and the fourth is in full and perfect peace. Thus, too, has the history of God’s people been ordered according to His pleasure who disposeth all things in number, and measure, and weight.233 For the church existed at first before the law; then under the law, which was given by Moses; then under grace, which was first made manifest in the coming of the Mediator. Not, indeed, that this grace was absent previously, but, in harmony with the arrangements of the time, it was veiled and hidden. For none, even of the just men of old, could find salvation apart from the faith of Christ; nor unless He had been known to them could their ministry have been used to convey prophecies concerning Him to us, some more plain, and some more obscure.



Chrysosthom Homily

http://www.clerus.org/bibliaclerusonline/en/cl5.htm#dn


5. “Again, ye have heard that it was said to them of old time, Thou shall not forswear thyself, but shall perform unto the Lord thine oaths. But I say unto you, swear not at all.”27


Why did He go straightway not to theft, but to false witness, passing over that commandment? Because he that steals, doth upon occasion swear also; but he that knows not either swearing or speaking falsehood, much less will he choose to steal. So that by this He hath overthrown the other sin likewise: since falsehood comes of stealing.


But what means, “Thou shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths?”28 It is this, “thou shalt be true in swearing.” “But I say unto you, swear not at all.”


Next, to lead them farther away from swearing by God, He saith, “Neither by Heaven, for it is God’s throne, nor by the earth, for it is the footstool of His feet; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King:”29 still speaking out of the prophetical writings, and signifying Himself not to be opposed to the ancients. This was because they had a custom of swearing by these objects, and he intimates this custom near the end of his Gospel.30


But mark, I pray thee, on what ground He magnifies the elements; not from their own nature, but from God’s relation to them, such as it had been in condescension declared. For because the tyranny of idolatry was great, that the elements might not be thought worthy of honor for their own sake, He hath assigned this cause, which we have mentioned, which again would pass on to the glory of God. For He neither said, “because Heaven is beautiful and great,” nor, “because earth is profitable;” but “because the one is God’s throne, the other His footstool;” on every side urging them on towards their Lord.


Neither by thy head,” saith He, “because thou canst not make one hair white or black.”31


Here again, not as wondering at man, hath He withdrawn him from swearing by his head (for so man himself would be worshipped), but as referring the glory to God, and signifying that thou art not master even of thyself, and of course therefore not of the oaths made by thy head. For if no one would give up his own child to another, much more will not God give up His own work to thee. For though it be thy head, yet is it the property of another; and so far from being master thereof, thou shalt not be able to do with it, no not the least thing of all. For He said not, “Thou canst not make one hair grow;” but, “Not so much as change its quality.”


But what,” it may be said, “if any one should require an oath, and apply constraint?” Let the fear of God be more powerful than the constraint: since, if thou art to bring forward such excuses, thou wilt keep none of the things which are enjoined.


Yea, for first with respect to thy wife thou wilt say, “what if she be contentious and extravagant;” and then as to the right eye, “what if I love it, and am quite on fire?” and of the unchaste look, “what then, if I cannot help seeing?” and of our anger against a brother, “what if I be hasty, and not able to govern my tongue?” and in general, all His sayings thou mayest on this wise trample under foot. Yet surely with regard to human laws thou darest not in any case use this allegation, nor say, “what then if this or that be the case,” but, willing or unwilling, thou receivest what is written.


And besides, thou wilt never have compulsion to undergo at all. For he that hath hearkened unto those former blessings, and hath framed himself to be such as Christ enjoined, will have no such constraint to endure from any, being held in reverence and veneration by all.


But let your yea, be yea; and your nay, nay: for that which exceedeth these cometh of the evil one.”32


What is it then that “exceeds yea” and “nay”? it is the oath, not the perjury. For this latter is quite acknowledged, and no man needs to learn that it is of the evil one; and it is not an excess, but an opposite: whereas an excess means something more, and added over and above: which kind of thing swearing is.


What then,” saith one, “was it of the evil one? and if it was of the evil one, how was it a law?” Well, this same thing thou wilt say concerning the wife also; how is that now accounted adultery, which was before permitted?


What now may one reply to this? That the precepts then uttered had reference to the weakness of them who were receiving the laws; since also to be worshipped with the vapor of sacrifice is very unworthy of God, just as to lisp is unworthy of a philosopher. That kind of thing accordingly was now laid down to be adultery, and swearing to be of the evil one, now that the principles of virtue have advanced. But if these things had been, from the first, laws of the devil, they would not have attained to so great goodness. Yea, for had those not been forerunners in the first place, these which we now have would not have been so easily received. Do not thou then require their excellency now, when their use is past: but then, when the time was calling for them. Or rather, if thou wilt, even now: yea, for now also is their virtue shown: and most of all for the very cause, by reason of which we find fault with them. For their appearing such now, is the greatest commendation of them. For had they not brought us up well, and made us meet for the reception of the greater precepts, they would not have appeared such.


Therefore as the breast, when it hath fulfilled all its part, and is dismissing the child to the more manly diet, after that appears useless; and the parents who before thought it necessary for the babe, now abuse it with ten thousand mockeries (and many even not content with words of abuse, anoint it also with bitter drugs; that when their words have not power to remove the child’s unseasonable propensity towards it, the real things may quench their longing): so also Christ saith, that they are of the evil one, not to indicate that the old law is of the devil, but in order that with most exceeding earnestness He might lead them away from their ancient poverty. And to them He saith these things; but with regard to the Jews, who were insensible and persevered in the same ways, He hath anointed their city all round with the terror of captivity, as with some bitter drug, and made it inaccessible. But since not even this had power to restrain them, but they desired to see it again, running to it, just as a child to the breast, He hid it from them altogether; both pulling it down, and leading away the more part of them far from it: as it is with our cattle; many, by shutting out the calves, in time induce them to forego their old familiar use of the milk.


But if the old law had belonged to the devil, it would not have led people away from idolatry, but rather would have drawn them on and cast them into it; for this did the devil desire. But now we see the opposite effect produced by the old law. And indeed this very thing, the oath, was ordained of old for this cause, that they might not swear by the idols. For “ye shall swear,” saith He, “by the true God.”33 They were then no small advantages which the law effected, but rather very great. For that they came unto the “strong meat,” was the work of its care.


What then,” it may be said, “is not swearing of the evil one?” Yes, indeed it is altogether of the evil one; that is, now, after so high a rule of self-restraint; but then not so.


But how,” one may say, “should the same thing become at one time good, at another time not good?” Nay, I say the very contrary: how could it help becoming good and not good, while all things are crying aloud, that they are so: the arts, the fruits of the earth, and all things else?


See it, for example, taking place first in our own kind. Thus, to be carried, in the earliest age of life, is good, but afterwards pernicious; to eat food that hath been softened in the mouth, in the first scene of our life, is good, but afterwards it is full of disgust; to be fed upon milk and to fly to the breast, is at first profitable and healthful, but tends afterwards to decay and harm. Seest thou how the same actions, by reason of the times, appear good, and again not so? Yea, and to wear the robe of a child is well as long as you are a boy, but contrariwise, when you are become a man, it is disgraceful. Wouldest thou learn of the contrary case too, how to the child again the things of the man are unsuited? Give the boy a man’s robe, and great will be the laughter; and greater the danger, he being often upset in walking after that fashion. Allow him to handle public affairs, and to traffic, and sow, and reap, and great again will be the laughter.


And why do I mention these things? when killing, which among all is acknowledged to be an invention of the evil one, killing, I say, having found its proper occasion, caused Phinehas, who committed it, to be honored with the priesthood.34 For that killing is a work of him whom I just now mentioned, hear what Christ saith; “Ye will do the works of your Father; he was a manslayer from the beginning.”35 But Phinehas became a manslayer, and “it was counted unto him” (so He speaks) “for righteousness:”36 and Abraham again on becoming not a man-slayer only, but (which was far worse) the slayer of his child, won more and more approbation. And Peter too wrought a twofold slaughter, nevertheless what he did was of the Spirit.37


Let us not then examine simply the acts, but the season too, and the causes, and the mind, and the difference of persons, and whatsoever else may accompany them, these let us search out with all exactness: for there is no arriving at the truth otherwise.


And let us be diligent, if we would attain unto the kingdom, to show forth something more than the old commandments; since we cannot otherwise lay hold of the things of Heaven. For if we arrive but at the same measure, that of the ancients, we shall stand without that threshold; for “except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, ye cannot enter into the kingdom of Heaven.”38

27 Mt 5,33-34.

28 See Nb 30,2 Dt 23,23.

29 Is 76,1 Ps 48,2.

30 Mt 23,16, et seq).

31 Mt 5,36.

32 Mt 5,37. St. Chrysostom deviates from the received text here: as if he were thinking also of Jc 5,12. [The variation is in the first half of the verse, but the resemblance to James 5,12 is not marked. In the latter half the citation is exact, and Chrysostom explains ejk tou` ponhrou` as the R. V. does: “of the evil one.”—R.]

33 Jr 4,2. LXX kai; ojmovsh/ Zh`/ Kuvrio", meta; ajlhqeiva" ejn, krivsei, kai; ejn dikaiosuvnh/).

34 Nb 25,8.

35 Jn 8,44.

36 Ps 106,31.

37 Ac 5,

38 Mt 5,20.

1