David Rejeski
Director
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies

 

Abstract:
The National Research Council (NRC), which carries out studies for the U.S. National Academies, released a report in December that highlights the significant shortfalls of the Bush administration in identifying and addressing the environment, health and safety (EHS) risks posed by engineered nanomaterials - a backbone of worldwide innovation. The NRC report, which was authored by an independent body of experts, echoes many of the findings of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) over the past few years regarding the federal government's lack of resources and a strategy to address the risks of these materials.

January 5th, 2009

Guidance for getting nano right

The National Research Council (NRC), which carries out studies for the U.S. National Academies, released a report in December that highlights the significant shortfalls of the Bush administration in identifying and addressing the environment, health and safety (EHS) risks posed by engineered nanomaterials - a backbone of worldwide innovation. The NRC report, which was authored by an independent body of experts, echoes many of the findings of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) over the past few years regarding the federal government's lack of resources and a strategy to address the risks of these materials.

The NRC report makes painfully clear that there has never been a strategy under the Bush administration for guiding nanotechnology risk research. A Republican congressman once referred to a draft of the administration's research planning effort as a "laundry list." His Democratic colleague called the same document a "juvenile piece of work." So the NRC report offers an opportunity for the Obama administration to get nanotechnology policy right. But one should not underestimate the size of the course correction that will be needed both at a White House and agency level to address years of declining public confidence in our government to manage risks associated with everything from consumer products to food to financial investments. 

One of PEN's major messages is that without a comprehensive strategy to understand the risks posed by engineered nanomaterials, there could be public backlash against this technology - one that could greatly improve daily life and the health of the planet. As I said in testimony before a Senate subcommittee in May 2008, if government and industry do not work to build public confidence in nanotechnology by proactively addressing any emerging risks, consumers may reach for the "No-Nano" label.

Public perceptions can have large economic impacts. As this technology advances, the lack of a comprehensive strategic risk research plan could clearly jeopardize the $14 billion investment governments and private industry worldwide have made in nanotechnology, as well as its great promise for huge advancements in health care, energy and manufacturing. As noted in the new NRC report, "An effective national EHS strategic research plan is essential to the successful development of and public acceptance of nanotechnology-enabled products."

The federal government's effort so far has resulted in limited understanding of the risks posed by the novel nano-based materials, and it has also created a web of confusion concerning the actual resources that are being allocated to improving our knowledge of these risks. PEN's analyses over the past three years have highlighted a substantial over-inflation of the government's nanotechnology risk-research investment figures. These findings were echoed by a Government Accountability Office report from last year and the new NRC report, which says, "The committee is concerned that the actual amount of federal funding specifically addressing the EHS risks posed by nanotechnology is far less than portrayed in the [National Nanotechnology Initiative] document and may be inadequate."
To further harp about the missed opportunities of the Bush administration to address the risks posed by nanomaterials and foster public trust would be a waste of time. The coming years provide an opportunity for the Obama administration to learn from the past. 
"The committee concludes that if no new resources are provided and the current levels of agency funding continue, the research that is generated cannot adequately evaluate the potential health and environment risks and effects associated with engineered nanomaterials to address the uncertainties in current understanding," the NRC report says. "Such an evaluation is critical for ensuring that the future of nanotechnology is not burdened by uncertainties and innuendo about potential adverse health and environmental effects."
So here you are, President-elect Obama, guidance for getting nano right. 


Posted: January 5, 2009
Electronics from a printer with nano ink
“Printed RFID tags should then be cheap enough to be attached to the packaging of low-cost products such as yogurts, where they can then monitor the temperature, and store and transmit data.”

(Nanowerk News) Electronic systems designed to perform simple functions, such as monitor the temperature on a yogurt pot, mustn’t cost much: This is where printed electronics are at an advantage. Researchers are now significantly improving the properties of printed circuits.
Televisions have changed dramatically: While bulky TV sets dominated our living rooms until just a few years ago, the screens are now so flat that they can easily be hung on the wall. A close look at the inside of these devices will reveal fine conductor paths and transistors that supply the electricity needed to switch the pixels on the screen on and off.
These circuits are manufactured layer by layer, usually by photolithography. The materials are deposited onto the entire surface of a substrate and covered with photoresist, which is exposed to light at specific points using a mask. The exposed photoresist alters its chemical properties: It becomes soluble and can be easily removed. The layer to be structured returns to the surface and can be etched away. However, the parts of the layer still covered with photoresist remain intact. One major disadvantage of this process is that a large fraction of the deposited material is not used. A more cost-efficient and resource-saving method is to deposit the material by printing only in places where it will actually be needed later.
Printed electronics already exist in the form of conductor paths and devices made from polymers. However, their electrical properties cannot compete with those of inorganic materials. The charge carriers in the polymers travel more slowly, with the result that a printed RFID tag, for example, will have a shorter transmission range than a conventional one.
Moreover, polymers tend to react more sensitively to moisture and UV light. Researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute of Integrated Systems and Device Technology IISB in Erlangen have now commissioned a process line in which electron devices can be printed from inorganic materials using an ink jet similar to those in any office printer. “We use ink made of nanoparticles and add a stabilizer so that the particles can be easily processed and do not clump together,” says IISB group manager Dr. Michael Jank.
The nano ink has passed the first printing tests and Jank hopes that the researchers will be able to print circuits performing simple functions in about a year’s time. “We expect printed products to cost around 50 percent less than silicon-based ones in the case of simple circuits,” he says. “Printed RFID tags should then be cheap enough to be attached to the packaging of low-cost products such as yogurts, where they can then monitor the temperature, and store and transmit data.”
Source: Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

State budget includes $50M for nano center

 Officials promote region for center

Observer-Dispatch
Posted Jan 05, 2009 @ 11:33 PM

Will the Mohawk Valley get a nanotechnology packaging facility?

The possibility is a topic of discussion in the state’s budget process, set to end in late March, but a decision may still be elusive.

State Assemblywoman RoAnn Destito, D-Rome, said it’s not definite that decisions will be made by the official March 31 budget deadline.

“I can’t tell you it’s going to be or not going to be,” she said.

Gov. David Paterson’s budget contains “$50 million for the development of IBM’s semiconductor packaging center in upstate,” according to budget documents published on the Internet. 

But a spokesman for Paterson’s budget office declined to give a time frame for a decision on the project. 

“There is no definitive timeline as of yet,” spokesman Matt Anderson said. “The Empire State Development Corp. is working closely with the governor’s office, IBM, legislators, and other stakeholders, conducting an appropriate review process. An announcement will be made in due course at the conclusion of that process.”

The development corporation is an economic development agency for the state.

The state and IBM announced this past summer that IBM would invest $1.5 billion in nanotechnology research and facilities, including the university-run packaging plant. 

If the Mohawk Valley were to land the 120,000-square-foot semiconductor packaging facility, it could attract as many as 200 scientists and researchers to the area, officials said last summer. 

Pushing for nanotech
On Monday, a top official from the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering at the University at Albany, which will be heavily involved with the facility, reiterated his support for the Mohawk Valley’s cause – if not to get the facility itself, then for some of its hundreds of spin-offs. 

“We are working closely with Assemblywoman Destito and the officials of Mohawk Valley EDGE on a plan to develop and promote Utica-Rome as the premier site for hosting the hundreds of high-tech, high-paying supplier and contractor jobs that will be attracted to New York to support the packaging research and development center,” Alain Kaloyeros, senior vice president and chief executive officer, said in an e-mailed statement. 

“The location of these jobs in Utica-Rome builds on and complements the nanotechnology educational and economic initiatives that the New York State Assembly has been advancing for the region under the leadership of Assemblywoman Destito, and which promise to reach fruition in the very near future,” Kaloyeros said. 

Kaloyeros made similar statements in July, when news of the facility first became public. 

Even if the area doesn’t get the plant, as many as 475 smaller businesses could be generated to supply the plant’s needs, and some of those could come to the Mohawk Valley, officials said. The packaging facility itself likely would not go on the nanotechnology manufacturing site that’s long been marketed in Marcy, however.

The packaging facility would be smaller in scale, focusing on research and development, rather than manufacturing, said Tim Dunn, vice president of marketing and business development for Mohawk Valley EDGE. EDGE is a Rome-based economic development agency for Oneida and Herkimer counties.

Local officials said Monday that they were working hard to promote the area’s chances.

“We need to make our case on why it would be important not only for the region, but how it would serve the state if it were here,” state Sen. Joseph Griffo, R-Rome, said.

The Albany area, the Hudson Valley and Binghamton are among the other areas that could be interested in getting some of the benefits from the plant, Griffo said. 

But Griffo and Oneida County Executive Anthony Picente pointed to the fact that the state had promised the Mohawk Valley a data center with 200 jobs, none of which materialized. 

“They need to start coming through for Upstate New York,” Picente said. 

EDGE’s Dunn said his agency was aggressively marketing the area.

“We continue to make the case for the Mohawk Valley as a location,” he said. “We are excited about the partnership we are creating with Albany Nano and we think it’s going to make long-term growth opportunities for our area.”

Nano Device Delivers Drugs More Effectively

Using tiny gold particles and infrared light, MIT researchers have developed a drug-delivery system that allows multiple drugs to be released in a controlled fashion.

Such a system could one day be used to provide more control when battling diseases commonly treated with more than one drug, according to the researchers.

"With a lot of diseases, especially cancer and AIDS, you get a synergistic effect with more than one drug," said Kimberly Hamad-Schifferli, assistant professor of biological and mechanical engineering and senior author of a paper on the work that recently appeared in the journal ACS Nano.

Delivery devices already exist that can release two drugs, but the timing of the release must be built into the device -- it cannot be controlled from outside the body. The new system is controlled externally and theoretically could deliver up to three or four drugs.

The new technique takes advantage of the fact that when gold nanoparticles are exposed to infrared light, they melt and release drug payloads attached to their surfaces.

Nanoparticles of different shapes respond to different infrared wavelengths, so "just by controlling the infrared wavelength, we can choose the release time" for each drug, said Andy Wijaya, graduate student in chemical engineering and lead author of the paper.

The team built two different shapes of nanoparticles, which they call "nanobones" and "nanocapsules." Nanobones melt at light wavelengths of 1,100 nanometers, and nanocapsules at 800 nanometers.

In the ACS Nano study, the researchers tested the particles with a payload of DNA. Each nanoparticle can carry hundreds of strands of DNA, and could also be engineered to transport other types of drugs.

In theory, up to four different-shaped particles could be developed, each releasing its payload at different wavelengths.

Other authors of the paper are Stefan Schaffer and Ivan Pallares, who were National Science Foundation REU (Research Experiences for Undergraduates) summer students through the MIT Department of Biological Engineering in 2008.


The Canadian Press

EDMONTON — It's the speck of dirt on the foot of a flea, and within it may be locked the Utopian dreams of a great beginning or the repressed fears of apocalyptic end times.

Nanotechnology – the super science of the modern age – is rocketing under the radar to transform how we live, work and play.

It manipulates matter so small the naked eye cannot see it and the mind's eye cannot comprehend it.

It is buffing, burnishing and delivering an eye-popping, gee-whiz oomph to more than 800 products around the world, with more rolling off the production line each week.

And the consumer wave is only the first wave.

Around the world, researchers clad in snow-white, clean-room “bunny-suits” are breaking ground in nanomedicine, figuring out how to use the minute particles to heal wounds faster, deliver drugs with more precision and create sci-fi sensors to eyeball ailments with atomic-level accuracy.

Nanotechnology is on track to regenerate damaged limbs and deliver double-helix-busting DNA research that could one day give us the power to design life forms or clean up every fetid dugout of polluted water in the Third World, with all the mind-boggling implications that carries for the global balance of power.

“We are working in a whole new dimension, at a scale where we are able to manipulate and take advantage of entirely new properties,” Nils Petersen, director general of the Edmonton-based National Institute for Nanotechnology, told The Canadian Press.

“It's a revolutionary period. I don't think there's any way of putting the genie back in the bottle.”

Look for nanoparticles and they are probably already in your house, your office, your closet and your makeup drawer. Nanotechnology powers your iPod, your iPhone, your XBox 360, perhaps your laptop. It is in the kitchen, stripping away bacteria in some water purifiers and keeping food fresh longer in containers. It is in tin foil, plastic wrap, cutting boards and non-stick cookware. It's in some diet pills, shakes and supplements.

Next to the baby's crib there are nano-coated stuffed animals that repel mites and mould. There are anti-bacteria baby bottles and pacifiers. In the garage, space-age chemicals buff up your car wax, stop your windshield from fogging, peel snow off your tire rims and give your golf clubs, hockey sticks and tennis rackets the strength of steel and the weight of a wand.

Goodies tumble in from all points of the compass: stink-free socks from Taiwan, spray-on condoms and germ-resistant chopsticks from China, deep-penetrating skin cleanser from Canada, dirt-repelling windshields from Australia, more-breathable bed sheets from the United States, super bandages from Britain and graffiti-busting paint from Mexico.

It is a worldwide free-for-all worth $147-billion last year and expected to hit $1-trillion a decade from now.

The National Institute for Nanotechnology, funded by the governments of Canada and Alberta and by the University of Alberta, is the country's front-line command post in nano's new world order. The seven-storey tall building is anchored deep in the earth behind a car park on the western edge of the university campus.

Completed two years ago at a cost of $52-million, this box-like construction of concrete, glass and steel is engineered to ruthlessly eliminate the slightest vibration that could wreak havoc on the particles being scanned and sectioned.

A ribbon of rubber on the ground floor reduces the hum of elevators, heating and lighting equipment on one side from affecting the lab equipment on the other.

If you talk in the hallway, you are shushed and shooed to prevent sound waves from penetrating the labs. Heat does not blow into the lab; it gently bleeds through overhead tubes. The temperature remains constant to prevent expansion and contraction.

There are 200-plus staffers from more than 30 countries. In one lab, 37-year-old Michael Woodside – who grew up in Ottawa designing magnetic levitation projects for high school science fairs – peers through an inverted microscope at the base of an organized mini-mountain of mirrors, prism circuits and electronic light sensors.

Beside him is a glass-topped steamer trunk encasing a warren of screwed-down lenses and optical devices that direct a laser beam that peels apart three-dimensional structures of biological molecules such as DNA and proteins.

When proteins fold properly, everything is fine. When they do not, diseases such as cystic fibrosis or Alzheimer's can result. “By understanding how they fold up we can hope to develop new treatments,” Dr. Woodside said.

If you don't know nano, you are not alone. Surveys in North America suggest seven out of 10 people know next to nothing about it, although public consciousness flares from time to time, such as when Michael Crichton's 2002 novel Prey came out. The book focused on rogue money-hungry, techno-geeks inventing nanoparticled-robots that eventually turn on them.

In terms of pure science, nanotechnology is the new frontier in significant shrinkage.

Significant.

Shrinkage.

Take a ruler, put your fingernail on a millimetre and try to imagine that millimetre divided into a thousand slices. Each slice is the upper limit of work at the nanoscale. Most of the work is at a level smaller than that.

It is a scale where particles are so mind-bogglingly tiny that they can be manipulated only with light, chemical reactions or even fluids. Stack 100,000 nanometres and you'd have the thickness of a piece of paper – one nanometre equals one-billionth of a metre.

What makes it special is that at the level of one to 100 nanometres, things start going a little wacko. Matter is governed no longer by the laws of classical physics but by quantum mechanics. Nanotechnology fundamentally alters the internal structure of compounds, giving them strength that they never had before, allowing them to change colour, conduct electricity and get bent into handy tubes, spheres and quantum dots.

Nanoparticles themselves have been around forever, discovered in the microscopic flakes that coloured the stained glass of ancient Roman goblets and in the high windows of churches in the Middle Ages. Recent inventions such as the scanning tunnelling microscope made possible what iconic American physicist Richard Feynman publicly predicted in a speech that has become the nanotechnology call to arms.

It was Dec. 29, 1959, a year before John Kennedy became president, and four days after Sony brought the first transistor TV to market.

Dr. Feynman was in Pasadena, Calif., at the California Institute of Technology, speaking to the American Physical Society, daring researchers to dream. If Mother Nature could work at the nano scale – wrap the entire blueprint of life in a strand of DNA – why couldn't man?

“In the year 2000, when they look back at this age, they will wonder why it was not until the year 1960 that anybody began seriously to move in this direction,” he said.

The scientists went back to their labs and the inventions multiplied. One breakthrough led to another until the big business of small became today's rush.

Techno-prospectors gallop off in all directions, with lawmakers in pursuit, trying to bring order to chaos.

In Canada last summer, 15 nano experts urged the federal government to act now to assess nano's health and environmental risks. They have not heard back.

In the United States, nano experts called for immediate safety tests for nano-ingredients in food, saying with no rules in place manufacturers are free to sprinkle in whatever they want.

Putting up regulatory fences is like plunging your fist into a bowl of mush. Regulators accustomed to beetling away in silos now must work as one to rein in a field that crosses multiple disciplines simultaneously – computing, engineering, biology, physics, chemistry.

What about ethics and privacy? What happens when cameras get so tiny you can barely see them, or marketers implant microscopic tracers in every item and sell to the highest bidder a list of what you bought when and where? If new technology can clean up the world's water supply, does anyone have the moral right to withhold it? And no one wants to imagine the future if al-Qaeda gets hold of this stuff.

“Everybody's really struggling with this,” said Andrew Maynard, chief science adviser to the Nanotechnology Project at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

The centre, based in Washington, D.C., is a think tank where Maynard's team tracks nano-inventions, educates the public and, when necessary, sounds the alarm.

“There is stuff happening in the labs which we haven't seen in the marketplace at the moment, but when we do five or 10 years from now, it will completely revolutionize things,” he said, sitting in his third-floor office, which is piled high with papers beneath prints of carbon nanotube electromicrographs from, he said with a laugh, “the days when I used to be a scientist.”

In photonics, for example, scientists are experimenting with light instead of electricity in circuits – a breakthrough that would revolutionize computers and take them to a whole new level of small.

In health, imagine a future where Canada could build the ultimate hockey player, admixing the fistic fury of Mark Messier and the work ethic of Chris Chelios with the eyes-in-the-back-of-the-head wizardry of Wayne Gretzky.

“We're just beginning to flex our muscles when it comes to designing functional strands of DNA and actually making them from scratch, but we're getting pretty close to being able to do some very sophisticated things,” Dr. Maynard said.

“You can imagine, as soon as you can play around with the code of life – what actually determines what a life form looks like – the potential there is absolutely mind-blowing.”

So, he said, is the danger of messing up in hideous ways that would punish generations to come.

Preliminary research is setting off the klaxons of alarm.

Dr. Maynard co-authored a study that suggests some forms of carbon nanotubes, the basic cylindrical building blocks of many nano structures, can behave like cancer-causing asbestos.

Is the study definitive? No.

Close to being definitive? No.

“There are some really big warning signs, but we don't know enough yet to say, ‘Yes, it definitely does behave like asbestos,' or ‘No it doesn't.' There is a gap in our knowledge that definitely has to be filled.”

Dr. Maynard noted that one thing history does tell us is to expect the unexpected.

“No matter how hard you try to predict where the technology will go, something unpredictable will happen.”

So what is this brave new world of nanotechnology? Is it the cloud-city idyll of The Jetsons or the skull-crunching fields of waste and death found in Terminator?

Your guess is as good as the experts'.


LIFE OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
30 BC-AD 640: Ancient Romans create drinking cups that change colour under different lighting because the glass contains nanoparticles of gold and silver. The colour change suggests nanoparticles behave differently than their macro counterparts, but it is a discovery that would not be recognized for about 2,000 years.
500-1400: Craftsmen of the Middle Ages use stained glass created with gold and silver nanoparticles.
1931: German scientists Max Knott and Ernst Ruska open up research into the world of the super-tiny when they develop the electron microscope.
1951: Erwin Mueller at Penn State University develops field-ion electron microscope. For the first time, individual atoms and their arrangement on a surface can be seen.
1958: Japanese physicist Leo Esaki discovers that materials at the nanoscale are controlled by different laws of behaviour — quantum mechanics rather than classical physics.
1959: U.S. physicist Richard Feynman, in a watershed speech 'There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom,' predicts the possibilities and potential of manoeuvring elements atom by atom.
1974: Norio Taniguchi of Tokyo Science University coins the word 'nanotechnology.'
1981: IBM researchers in Switzerland invent the scanning tunnelling microscope, which allows scientists not only to observe nanoscale particles but also to control them.
1985: Researchers at Rice University in Houston and Britain's University of Sussex discover a nanoparticle named 'fullerene.' Shaped like a soccer ball and dubbed the Buckyball, the unique molecule is so rugged it can survive collisions with metals and other materials at speeds higher than 32,000 kilometres an hour. Has potential applications in engine parts, electronics and drug delivery.
1988: Bell researchers discover quantum dots that allow scientists to manipulate colours and pave the way to revolutionize the way solar energy is collected. Also improve medical diagnostics and optical devices.
1991: Sumio Iijima at NEC in Japan discovers a new form of carbon called nanotubes. They behave like metals or semi-conductors but can conduct electricity better than copper, transmit heat better than diamonds and are stronger than steel.
1996: The United States begins a co-ordinated effort on nanoscale research when several federal agencies meet to plan priorities and programs.
Late 1990s: Consumer products made with nanotechnology begin to appear on the market in suncreams, cosmetics, sports equipment, car wax and clothes.
2000: U.S. president Bill Clinton devotes significant budget funding to the new National Nanotechnology Initiative.
2001: Canada creates the Edmonton-based National Institute of Nanotechnology to support research and commercial applications in the field.
2002: The European Union forms the Nanoforum Project to raise awareness of nanotechnology issues.
Sources: 
Discover NanoNano Forum
The Canadian Press


A look at some of the nano products that have already made it to store shelves 17 hours ago

Some of the nano materials that have already made it to store shelves:

Nano products: There are more than 800 items on the market that advertise nanotechnology behind their making. About 80 per cent are available to Canadians through retail stores, distributors and the Internet.

The good: Socks and gym towels that don't get smelly, germ-free toilets, extra-strong hockey sticks, scratch-resistant car paint, wrinkle-and stain-free clothing, self-cleaning windows.

The bad: There's not enough research to know what risks, if any, are posed by nano materials. One scientist suggests staying away from nano products for children, such as anti-bacterial baby soothers and bottles.

The future: The U.S. army is working on an electromagnetic cloak that bends light and could make tanks invisible.

The cost: About $147 billion was spent creating nano products worldwide in 2007. That figure is set to climb to $3.1 trillion by 2015.

Quote: "It is huge. It is going to possibly affect all aspects of our lives." - Elizabeth Nielsen, scientist and consultant with the Consumers Council of Canada.


Nano 'Tractor Beam' Traps DNA

ScienceDaily (Jan. 5, 2009) — Using a beam of light shunted through a tiny silicon channel, researchers have created a nanoscale trap that can stop free floating DNA molecules and nanoparticles in their tracks. By holding the nanoscale material steady while the fluid around it flows freely, the trap may allow researchers to boost the accuracy of biological sensors and create a range of new 'lab on a chip' diagnostic tools.The Cornell University research team reports its findings in the Jan. 1, 2009, issue of the journal Nature.

"For this research to emerge in the marketplace in a device such as a 'lab on a chip', it is essential for engineers to be able to manipulate matter at the scale of molecules and atoms, particularly while the matter is contained within a fluid stream only slightly larger than the particles themselves," says William Schultz, the National Science Foundation (NSF) program officer who oversaw the researchers' grant. "NSF and other funding agencies have made nano-science and -technology a high priority. The Cornell researchers have made an important step in realizing the full potential of these devices."

Light has been used to manipulate cells and even nanoscale objects before, but the new technique allows researchers to manipulate the particles more precisely and over longer distances.

"At the nanoscale, we can think of light like a series of massless particles called photons," says Cornell engineer David Erickson, one of the co-authors of the study. "We've demonstrated a way to condense these photons down to a very small area and stream them along a special type of waveguide, a device that acts like a nanoscale optical fiber. When pieces of matter, like DNA or nanoparticles, float near these streaming photons, they are sucked in and pushed along with the flow. The effect is sort of like moving a truck by throwing baseballs at it. The trick is that we found a way to have a large number of highly efficient "collisions" between the photons and the nanoparticles, getting them to stay in our device and keep them moving along it."

Erickson and fellow Cornell engineer Michal Lipson, along with their graduate students Allen Yang, Sean Moore and Bradley Schmidt, and colleagues in Erickson's and Lipson's research groups, crafted a wave guide to shunt light into a narrow beam, laying a trap for the DNA and other small pieces of material.

Each of the tiny channels within the waveguide is only 60-120 nanometers (billionths of a meter) wide, thinner than the 1,500 nanometer wavelength of the infrared laser light channeling through them. The channels keep the light waves focused and enhance their ability to interact with the DNA particles, preventing them from flowing by.

The breakthrough is the use of the slot waveguide, which condenses a light wave's energy to scales as small as the target molecules, overcoming prior limitations caused by light diffraction. Because the waveguide is also a "nanochannel" it can both trap and transport objects using light.

For their experiments, the researchers used water solutions containing either DNA or tiny nanoparticles, washing the fluids over the waveguide microchannels. At a speed of 80 micrometers per second, the system traps less than a fourth of the target particles flowing by, but with smaller channel sizes, slower flows and higher energy lasers, the success rate increases.

"What we're hoping to do now is better understand some of the underlying physics to see what else might be possible with this approach," adds Erickson. "Ultimately we imagine being able to take all the ultrafast and highly efficient optical devices that have been developed for communications and other applications over the last 20 years and apply them to the manipulation of matter in different types of nanosystems. Hopefully in the future we can shuttle around individual strands of DNA the same way we now shuttle around light."

In future iterations of the system, the light will both capture the particles and transport them, so the DNA would arrive at the trap and then be directed to another location, such as a sensor or a staging ground for the assembly of a structure.


Adapted from materials provided by National Science Foundation.


New Nano Device Aids Drug Dispersal

Posted on: Monday, 5 January 2009, 08:06 CST

Researchers found a more accurate way to deliver cancer drugs, by harnessing the power of gold nanoparticles.

They wrote in the journal ACS Nano that the system could release a number of drugs in a specific part of the body at desired times.

The device relies on the fact that different particles melt when exposed to different levels of infrared light. Therefore, different drugs on the particles could be released in a controlled way.

Researchers say delivering drugs directly to a specific site within the body is beneficial because you can use relatively toxic drugs without causing widespread damage to healthy tissue.

A number of trials are using nanoparticles to take drugs directly to the site of a tumor.

 

Doctors shine near-infrared light on the site, penetrating the skin to reach the tumor. It causes the particles to heat up and release the drugs contained inside.

The device developed by the MIT team involves two differently shaped nanoparticles which have separate melting points, meaning complex HIV/Aids drugs can be released in a controlled way at appropriate intervals.

"Just by controlling the infrared wavelength, we can choose the release time," said lead author Andy Wijaya.

Kat Arney, of Cancer Research UK, said that nanoparticles were a "hot topic in cancer research because they can directly target tumors to deliver a payload of drugs".

 

"This new technique is clever because it means a number of different drugs can be released. But although it's exciting the work is still at an early stage and is not yet ready to be used in patients."

---

Image 2: The top image shows a mixture of gold nanoparticles. The longer particles are called nanobones, and the smaller are nanocapsules. Bottom left: After the nanoparticles are hit with 800 nanometer wavelength infrared light, the nanocapsules melt and release their payload. Nanobones remain intact. Right: After the nanoparticles are hit with 1100 nanometer wavelength infrared light, the nanobones melt and release their payload. Nanocapsules remain intact. Image / Andy Wijaya

 


 



When DNA molecules suspended in a tiny stream of water flow through a nanoscale channel, they can be captured by a field of light if that light is confined in a device called a slot waveguide. The pressure from the light can then propel the DNA along the waveguide channel to bring the molecules to new locations. Such manipulation could prove valuable for assembling nanoscale structures, driving powerful sensors and developing a range of other technologies. (Credit: Nicolle Rager Fuller, National Science Foundation)